Hi
We are not familiar with the proposal and not sure how it would impact the service modeling discussion or documentation. Since it is asking for agreement on adopting universally for all the modeling areas, so I feel that we are not in the place of committing to it right now. Lingli From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of denghui (L) Sent: 2018年7月9日 16:07 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype Hello, modelers, This is a call for agreement on using the lifecycle stereotype according to the last call. Information of the proposal can be found at <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Lifecycle+Stereotype+Proposal> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Lifecycle+Stereotype+Proposal. Agreements need to be reached across the modeling subcommittee are: * Agree on using lifecycle stereotype and following the definitions/state machine for the resource IM * Agree on adopting the same approach for other modeling areas Deadline for this call is July 11th, PST 00:00. Please comment on the mailing list if you have any concerns. Best regards, DENG Hui -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11016): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11016 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23243920/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
