Hello owners of requirements, Thanks PTL meeting time and theirs kind comments, we have moved 3+5 out of high level requirement into other table. For the left of those requirements, please help to join the dedicated discussion today with SDC after modeling subcommittee call
>From yesterday, PTL and TSC has strong concern about modeling requirement >bring additional work besides of M1 requirement. Please each owner identify with impacted PTL, whether your requirement in the scope of M1 of that impact projects, if not, that requirement will also have to be moved into lower priority for future release other than R3. As SDC suggested in the list, each of owner, please help to prepare and explain your requirement Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: denghui (L) Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 4:46 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: 'Lando,Michael' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: [modeling] High level requirement reviewed by PTLs and SDC Hello, owners of requirements I have sent you a private email last week about today PTL's meeting that you will kindly help to explain your proposed high requirement to PTLs, whether impacted PTLs agree it and allocate the implementation resource to support it If impacted PTLs agree, this requirement will stay in R3 high level requirement, otherwise, it will move to lower priority category. Since there are so many high level requirements related to SDC, if today PTL session time is not enough, SDC PTLs could help to discuss it on Tuesday again right after modeling subcommittee call, we can use the same bridge of modeling subcommittee on Tuesday. Thanks a lot for your attendance Best regards, DENG Hui -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11170): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11170 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23530211/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
