Jess, Same for DCAE; we don’t need CLM jobs for Casablanca branch. All outstanding vulnerabilities will be looked at for Dublin hence master branch CLM job will suffice.
Thanks, Vijay From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DRAGOSH, PAM Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 7:09 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-release <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Onap-release] CLM reports for multiple branches ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Jess, For Policy, we are done with CLM work for Casablanca. We don’t have plans for the Maintenance Release to do any work that would affect CLM reports. So I am not going to add an unnecessary job for Casablanca CLM. Thanks, Pam From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 5:56 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, onap-release <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Onap-release] CLM reports for multiple branches Dear ONAP team. This is a reminder for adding your Casablanca branch to CLM. As a reminder from my previous email, you can decide to add just "casablanca" or have both "master" and "casablanca" running. That is completely up to the tech team. I am still waiting for action on these particular projects who must have "casablanca" running in CLM: AAI APPC CCSDK DCAE Integration OOM OOF Policy SDC SDNC SO Thanks so much and please reach out in case you have questions Jess On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:33 PM Jessica Wagantall <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear ONAP team and PTLs, I would like to clarify the current behavior of our Nexus IQ CLM reports as of today. Currently, IT IS possible to run CLM branches for more than one branch at a time. There is just one limitation which I would like to explain in the following example. If the tech team decides to run maven-clm for more than one branch, please keep in mind that the reports would need to be fetched through the Jenkins job link (for example https://jenkins.onap.org/view/CLM/job/aaf-authz-maven-clm-master/24<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fq-3Dhttps-3A__jenkins.onap.org_view_CLM_job_aaf-2Dauthz-2Dmaven-2Dclm-2Dmaster_24-26sa-3DD-26source-3Dhangouts-26ust-3D1544197805032000-26usg-3DAFQjCNH2mXt9c7Goktd-5FqPRgtbpAPV-5FbMA&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=dKl7iMA_ogVxxjZzvP2vgHhdktBlkQGCGbdrPRZmF00&s=LKW9gMxjHfvyAdCiOzoS4jztquJMqXgvBE2hW5ba3IA&e=>/) rather than browsing into https://nexus-iq.wl.linuxfoundation.org/assets/index.html#/reports/violations<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fq-3Dhttps-3A__nexus-2Diq.wl.linuxfoundation.org_assets_index.html-2523_reports_violations-26sa-3DD-26source-3Dhangouts-26ust-3D1544197805032000-26usg-3DAFQjCNFYsPCi5D3ZtOtOxUE-2DVWZF63-2D20A&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=dKl7iMA_ogVxxjZzvP2vgHhdktBlkQGCGbdrPRZmF00&s=DL2Ud6lQko-T_QrxE0Pn1A8qXbx5bkYXZTUL2505Zn8&e=> directly. The reason behind this, when CLM runs for more than one branch, the pool of reports in nexus-iq.wl.linuxfoundation.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nexus-2Diq.wl.linuxfoundation.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=dKl7iMA_ogVxxjZzvP2vgHhdktBlkQGCGbdrPRZmF00&s=Lns_pgJCAdQTOdgDLxhhSG8f-ZSRErGdtUFVO-EWxTE&e=> will display the report for the branch that ran last. For now, we need to make sure the following teams have their casablanca branch running in CLM: AAI APPC CCSDK DCAE Integration OOM OOF Policy SDC SDNC SO Can the PTL's please help me adding the needed changes to your project's yaml files? (Whether is running master, casablanca or both I would leave it to the PTL to decide which approach is more comfortable. I would be happy to review your changes. Thanks so much again! Please feel free to let me know for any questions. Jess -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14478): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14478 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28742011/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
