Yang, I'm not sure to get the need of version like 1.3.3 in any project. Because either it's in an ONAP release (then it's tagged as ONAP release like 2.0.0, 1.1.0, 3.0.0, 3.0.1), either it's not really used no?
Regards, --- Sylvain Desbureaux Le 12/02/2019 15:32, « Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) » <[email protected]> a écrit : Sylvain, Each project already has its own independent release versions, like 1.3.3 in testsuite repo https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=testsuite.git;a=shortlog;h=refs%2Fheads%2Fcasablanca. ONAP 3.0.1 tagging needs more info than just digits to separate it out from individual project release version. Regards, -Yang -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sylvain Desbureaux Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 7:44 AM To: [email protected]; Gary Wu <[email protected]>; Catherine LEFEVRE <[email protected]>; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Jim Baker <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? And if we can omit '-ONAP' part in the tag (so 3.0.1 as tag or better v3.0.1 like Kubernetes) as it's a tautologie, it would be awesome! --- Sylvain Desbureaux Le 11/02/2019 23:34, « [email protected] au nom de Gary Wu » <[email protected] au nom de [email protected]> a écrit : For each release, all gerrit repos that participated in the release are supposed to be tagged accordingly to mark exactly what was released. For Casablanca, the tag was 3.0.0-ONAP. For Casablanca MR, the tag should be 3.0.1-ONAP. It does not appear that any repo has had this tag created yet. Thanks, Gary -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:43 PM To: [email protected]; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Jim Baker <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? Hi Yang, Michal, I am not sure what you mean by LF doing 3.0.1 Tagging. 3.0.1 is the release version that we agreed for the Casablanca Maintenance Release https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release/index.html#casablanca-maintenance-release-3-0-1 The Casablanca Maintenance Release has been signed - off on 1/31/2019 based on the set of containers that the Integration Team has validated. I have sent an e-mail last week to perform a final review of the Casablanca Maintenance release note including Release Manifest, Nexus Release Artifacts and Docker Release based on the what has been validated since we have discovered an issue with the release note. https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-release/message/1023 As discussed today during the PTLs call, although PTLs have submitted their changes regarding their project specific release note, the changes are not reflected correctly on each Project Specific Release Notes https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/release/releaserepos.html#doc-releaserepos - OOM being one of these projects ... The Documentation team is actively working to fix any identified issue. As soon as all the changes are correctly then I will send a communication to all the ONAP distro list. Any new commit in review which are promoting some images to newer version inside Casablanca branch should be rejected by reviewer, committer or PTL! Hope it clarifies the current situation. Best regards Catherine -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yang Xu Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 9:01 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Jim Baker <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? Hi Jim, Is LF doing 3.0.1 tagging? Thanks, -Yang -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michal Ptacek Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 12:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? Dear ONAP friends, I am searching for information whether we already have official Casablanca Maintenance Release ready for deployment, according to schedule it was signed-off on 31th January I also don't see any outstanding issues in report page maintained by integration team https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Casablanca-2BMaintenance-2BRelease-2BIntegration-2BTesting-2BStatus&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=U2Cqqtov4GYQw6pJC_u_Q72jDYcKcnDrCsw3vjwDzYY&s=0rWoGZIIWctsZXa0BuDgOElnBnl3iT4CC2n7VO6D09g&e= but OOM project still don't have this 3.0.1 tag and also I see few more commits in review which are promoting some images to newer version inside Casablanca branch So the question is, whether official Casablanca Maintenance Release is now available for installation ? Thank you, Michal _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15490): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15490 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29741058/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
