I have addressed the tag requests that I had pending in RT.. I will go through the manifest once more and tag any missing ones..
Jess On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:42 PM Gary Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > I think all the Casablanca MR artifacts have already been released. What > is missing is the "3.0.1-ONAP" tag on the gerrit repos. > > Thanks, > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lefevre, Catherine [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 3:53 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: Michal Ptacek <[email protected]>; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed > Network) <[email protected]>; Gary Wu <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; 'Jim Baker' <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: URGENT - Casablanca Maintenance - Formally release the artifacts > !!!! > Importance: High > > Thank you all for the clarifications. > I have got it now > I thought that this process was already triggered by each PTL with the LF > Helpdesk. > > > Dear PTLs, > > Please provide urgently the necessary information to LF Helpdesk creating > a ticket to release formally the Casablanca Maintenance Containers > certified by the Integration Team - thank you > > Staging repo : > GroupId:ArtifactsId : org.onap.<project name>:xxx Version : x.x.x > > Docker build > https://jenkins.onap.org/view/<project name>/job/<project > name>-master-docker-java-properties-daily/<build nbr>/ > > Docker Staging image: xxxx > > Please also check > https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/release/release-manifest.html#doc-release-manifest > · Release Manifest > · Nexus Release Artifacts nexus.onap.org > · Docker Release Images nexus3.onap.org > > Many thanks & regards > Catherine > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michal Ptacek [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 7:41 AM > To: 'Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)' <[email protected]>; 'Gary Wu' < > [email protected]>; Lefevre, Catherine <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; 'Jim Baker' <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is > casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? > > Thank you all for detailed clarification, > > From the OOM perspective I see following commits to be merged (must have) > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_75897_&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=-7EZI_dou0lz585zGX4TyMVNHeF7XzGtAl1Bd3sF6X4&e= > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_76318_&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=IJ_Dq5kk2nX04Q1_k4eaFNj7j0lGM9NHpqL2D60PgRA&e= > (optionally) > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_78216_&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=WK6tpoXoTPX3nY26HfVum5Fwz0ImOzFGkxIuHLJvpG0&e= > > before declaring 3.0.1 tag into OOM ... because they contains images > versions mentioned in release manifest > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.onap.org_en_casablanca_release_release-2Dmanifest.html-23doc-2Drelease-2Dmanifest&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=IPgNNM9Dc8EtvU2U4B2SBCAN5AgDVDiEovmUDCazTz4&e= > > can we do it today ? > I would like to take "official 3.0.1 release" for offline deployments > > We can also check if there are more differences between versions from > release-manifest > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.onap.org_en_casablanca_release_release-2Dmanifest.html-23doc-2Drelease-2Dmanifest&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=IPgNNM9Dc8EtvU2U4B2SBCAN5AgDVDiEovmUDCazTz4&e= > and current OOM casablanca images in chart files, I expect there should be > none. > > Thank you, > Michal > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:05 AM > To: Gary Wu <[email protected]>; Catherine LEFEVRE < > [email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Jim Baker <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is > casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? > > Catherine, > > There has been no new change merged in Casablanca Maintenance release > since 1/31. As Gary explained, we need 3.0.1 tagging for each project. LF > used to do that for all projects based on project input. > > Regards, > -Yang > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Wu > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 5:34 PM > To: Catherine LEFEVRE <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) < > [email protected]>; [email protected]; Jim Baker < > [email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is > casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? > > For each release, all gerrit repos that participated in the release are > supposed to be tagged accordingly to mark exactly what was released. > > For Casablanca, the tag was 3.0.0-ONAP. > > For Casablanca MR, the tag should be 3.0.1-ONAP. It does not appear that > any repo has had this tag created yet. > > Thanks, > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:43 PM > To: [email protected]; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) < > [email protected]>; [email protected]; Jim Baker < > [email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is > casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ? > > Hi Yang, Michal, > > I am not sure what you mean by LF doing 3.0.1 Tagging. > 3.0.1 is the release version that we agreed for the Casablanca Maintenance > Release > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__onap.readthedocs.io_en_latest_release_index.html-23casablanca-2Dmaintenance-2Drelease-2D3-2D0-2D1&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=ZCwpFSdym4hhPPhwgq2Ddm05lOxGM2cKXPvf57D50Qs&e= > > The Casablanca Maintenance Release has been signed - off on 1/31/2019 > based on the set of containers that the Integration Team has validated. > I have sent an e-mail last week to perform a final review of the > Casablanca Maintenance release note including Release Manifest, Nexus > Release Artifacts and Docker Release based on the what has been validated > since we have discovered an issue with the release note. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_g_onap-2Drelease_message_1023&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=PO37j5eem6dXhwIkFwE_FOe-0xuUCJslYSmoNvqI8qM&e= > > As discussed today during the PTLs call, although PTLs have submitted > their changes regarding their project specific release note, the changes > are not reflected correctly on each Project Specific Release Notes > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.onap.org_en_casablanca_release_releaserepos.html-23doc-2Dreleaserepos&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=mUgRf1MHiyF-FMGI-flY5EnoTVeKeusOmmvXD9Otz38&e= > - OOM being one of these projects ... > > The Documentation team is actively working to fix any identified issue. > As soon as all the changes are correctly then I will send a communication > to all the ONAP distro list. > > Any new commit in review which are promoting some images to newer version > inside Casablanca branch should be rejected by reviewer, committer or PTL! > > Hope it clarifies the current situation. > > Best regards > Catherine > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Yang Xu > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 9:01 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Jim Baker < > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 > signed-off ? > > Hi Jim, > > Is LF doing 3.0.1 tagging? > > Thanks, > -Yang > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Michal Ptacek > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 12:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off > ? > > Dear ONAP friends, > > I am searching for information whether we already have official Casablanca > Maintenance Release ready for deployment, according to schedule it was > signed-off on 31th January > > I also don't see any outstanding issues in report page maintained by > integration team > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Casablanca-2BMaintenance-2BRelease-2BIntegration-2BTesting-2BStatus&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=U2Cqqtov4GYQw6pJC_u_Q72jDYcKcnDrCsw3vjwDzYY&s=0rWoGZIIWctsZXa0BuDgOElnBnl3iT4CC2n7VO6D09g&e= > > but OOM project still don't have this 3.0.1 tag and also I see few more > commits in review which are promoting some images to newer version inside > Casablanca branch > > So the question is, whether official Casablanca Maintenance Release is now > available for installation ? > > Thank you, > Michal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15505): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15505 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29774377/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
