The DMaaP team has posted results – looks good – I have +1’d the review along 
with several other developers – we can get an OOM committer to merge +2 the 
change as soon as the -1 review is removed from March 1st.

Workaround for -1 hanging reviews:
There is a workaround to remove -1 reviews where the reviewer may be away or on 
vacation – submit a new patch to the review – in this case do a minor change to 
a comment on a helm chart that will not require a full CD retest/review and 
then we will reset the reviews – we can then +2 the change

The procedure to repatch (rebase is not enough) is here if you need it - 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Development#ONAPDevelopment-Amendingexistinggerritchangesinreview

/michael


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Michael O'Brien
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:30 PM
To: Conor Ward <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) <[email protected]>; Borislav Glozman 
<[email protected]>; Ronan Keogh <[email protected]>; Emmett Cox 
<[email protected]>; Gerard Nugent <[email protected]>; Fiachra Corcoran 
<[email protected]>; de Talhouet, Alexis <[email protected]>; 
Mariusz Sobucki <[email protected]>; Paul Dennehy P 
<[email protected]>; Tom O'Neill <[email protected]>; Mike Elliott 
<[email protected]>; Prudence Au <[email protected]>; James MacNider 
<[email protected]>; Catherine LEFEVRE 
<[email protected]>; Brian <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] DMaaP Certificate issue for 3.0.2-ONAP tag

Conor,
   Adding onap-discuss as we need to keep the other members of TSC-119/120 in 
the loop for Monday
https://jira.onap.org/browse/TSC-119
https://jira.onap.org/browse/TSC-120

   No problem, the deadline is Monday – I would need the -1 review from 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> addressed or removed – 
that was March 8th
   Ronan, conor, can you repost the hc and pod results as well as getting 
Michal to retest with the patch you posted since his last review
   The last checks I see are from the 1st before the -1
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/79210/
/michael

Code-Review

-1 Michal Ptacek



From: Conor Ward <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, March 21, 2019 at 12:25
To: Michael O'Brien <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Borislav Glozman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ronan Keogh 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Emmett Cox 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Gerard Nugent 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Fiachra Corcoran 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Mariusz Sobucki 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Paul Dennehy P 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Tom O'Neill 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: DMaaP Certificate issue for 3.0.2-ONAP tag


Hi Michael,



Is it possible to get this code change<https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/79210/> 
merged before 25th March as the 3.0.2-ONAP tag is being created then. If we 
need to do anything else to get this merged let us know as we have already 
posted the running pods and robot healthcheck results for DMaaP components.



Kind Regards,

Conor


This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential 
and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service

This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential 
and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16279): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16279
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/30699859/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to