Hi Keong, Either this Friday or next Monday at 5:00 UTC will work for me.
Seshu, what time do you prefer if you would like to join the discussion? On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:13 PM Keong Lim <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Huabing, > > > > Yes, we could have a meeting to discuss it. I would be available on Friday > 26th April or Monday 29th April. > > Please cc Seshu, as he had some knowledge of the problems in the > UUI-to-AAI calls. > > > > According to this > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?year=2019&month=4&day=26&p1=137&p2=179&p3=136&p4=195&p5=676&p6=771&p7=33&p8=240 > > The times for India-China-Australia meeting are limited, but maybe 5.00 > UTC is possible? > > > > > > Keong > > > > > > *From:* 赵化冰 [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, April 19, 2019 3:52 PM > *To:* onap-discuss <[email protected]>; Keong Lim < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] MSB performance results? #aai #msb > #usecaseui #performance > > > > Hi Keong, > > > > MSB API Gateway's performance testing result is 50,000 QPS on a 8 > core machine as long as the back-end service is not the bottleneck. > So it's more likely a restriction from the back-end side. > > > > I suggest we schedule a meeting to discuss this issue and figure out the > solution? > What do you think? > > > > BR, > > Huabing > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:02 AM Keong Lim <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have received reports that the UUI calling to AAI via MSB suffers from > some performance problems, apparently stemming from the number of REST API > calls required to retrieve data and the fix apparently being to reset the > MSB. I know that AAI also has performance problems, but those only result > in slowness, not requiring a reset to fix the service. > > While I don't have specific figures for the size/number/frequency of the > transactions, it seems reasonable that testing the system during > development should not be hitting any particular performance limits, e.g. > much less than what a production system might experience. > > We have suggested some optimisations to consolidate the number of REST > calls using https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-2375, but that is only a > temporary reprieve since the amount of data always grows. > > So, I would like find out what are the documented performance test > results/expectations for MSB? Where are the limitations? > > On the wiki, I found: > > - https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/MSB+performance+metrics+and+testing > > which only describes some hopeful test methods for Beijing release, but no > results shown. On > > - > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/MSB+Casablanca+Release+Planning-M1#MSBCasablancaReleasePlanning-M1-PlatformMaturity > - > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/MSB+Release+Planning+for+Dublin#MSBReleasePlanningforDublin-PlatformMaturity > > the suggestion is that S3P performance level 1 has been achieved, but does > not link to the evidences page. > > Where can I find the evidences pages? > > > Thanks, > Keong > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16671): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16671 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31219423/21656 Mute #aai: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=aai&subid=2740164 Mute #msb: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=msb&subid=2740164 Mute #usecaseui: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=usecaseui&subid=2740164 Mute #performance: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=performance&subid=2740164 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
