Hi all,

I'm not sure if readiness-check container minimization has been already 
discussed.

Anyhow, the container itself is part of every ONAP installation and even with 
multiple versions. The container itself just runs a simple python script, but 
it is based on Ubuntu and it installs also a lot of debugging software. So it 
has about 600MB. By using python alpine image and by removal of debugging 
packages, we can shrink it to few dozens of MBs.

However it won't help if different ONAP helm charts will still point to old 
Ubuntu based versions. So part of the minimization process should be a 
modification (and testing) of all helm charts to use the same small readiness 
check container.

Docker file:
https://git.onap.org/oom/tree/kubernetes/readiness/docker/init/Dockerfile

Currently used image versions and their popularity:
oom/kubernetes# grep -r "readiness-check:" | sed -e 
"s/^.*readiness-check\:/readiness-check\:/" | sort | uniq -c
      4 readiness-check:1.1.0
    125 readiness-check:2.0.0
      1 readiness-check:2.0.1
     15 readiness-check:2.0.2

Sizes of readiness-images:
# docker images | grep readiness
oomk8s/readiness-check                                           2.0.2          
        cdfde4f65367        6 weeks ago         592MB
oomk8s/readiness-check                                           2.0.1          
        a54f2020b856        8 months ago        632MB
oomk8s/readiness-check                                           2.0.0          
        867cb038e1d2        13 months ago       616MB
oomk8s/readiness-check                                           1.1.0          
        c0cce3bbe795        14 months ago       585MB

The number of image versions available at each k8s node is based on set of ONAP 
components running there. In worst case all image versions are available at all 
nodes.

A quick look into docker inspect shows, that only 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 shares a few 
layers. Thus I've tested it locally and all 4 images together consume over 
2.3GB of disk space (i.e. just 125MB is shared among them).

I would recommend readiness-check container image for minimization.

Best Regards,
Martin

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16679): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16679
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31320038/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to