Dear Mike, On 22.05.2019 11:12, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Krzysztof > > OOM project will no more manage Helm charts for the various projects. > Each project should manage their chart in their repo (AA&I started). It > should hep you to d > > I agree that using a label can help to find the link between a pod and a > project using live info. To be discussed with OOM team. > > Best Regards > > Eric > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Krzysztof Opasiak [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : mardi 21 mai 2019 20:14 > À : DEBEAU Eric TGI/OLN; [email protected] > Objet : Re: [onap-discuss] Mapping between pod name and project
[...] >> >> I will provide this mapping in documentation. >> > > Yes this is definitely a step forward but it may easily get out of sync > or we may be missing sth. That's why maybe enforcing the usage of one of > standard labels like app.kubernetes.io/component or > app.kubernetes.io/part-of would be a better choice? > > In this way we could easily track the responsible project inside OOM > charts and very easy extract that info from a live deployment? > @Mike What do you think about this idea? Best regards, -- Krzysztof Opasiak Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#17175): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/17175 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31697270/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
