Thanks Dan. Regards, Piyush
From: TIMONEY, DAN <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 11:00 PM To: [email protected]; Piyush Garg <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] MD-SAL Data migration Casablanca to Dublin #sdnc Piyush, Here's a link to the Gerrit change that updated those enum values: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/sdnc/northbound/+/79746<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Fsdnc%2Fnorthbound%2F%2B%2F79746&data=02%7C01%7CPiyush.Garg1%40amdocs.com%7C09f55ece032942306dea08d70c6edf4a%7Cc8eca3ca127646d59d9da0f2a028920f%7C0%7C0%7C636991542661993858&sdata=PswQJtUpXblGMvvhw3JYO6XdjB%2FGs1wetuJPoUwoDjQ%3D&reserved=0> Those are used for the CCVPN use case, and that particular change removed those somewhat generic request action values and replaced them with more granular values (e.g CreateSDWANLanPortInstance instead of CreateSDWANAttachmentInstance). So, I don't know that there is necessarily a one to one mapping - you'd need to look at other fields in the request to figure out if the "attachment" being added was a port vs a site, for example. However, since that enum only applies to the request type itself, I'm not sure that it's used in any of the data stored in MD-SAL. Prakash - I noticed that change was yours. Maybe you might have more insights as well? Dan Dan Timoney Principal Technical Staff Member AT&T Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Office : +1 (732) 420-3226 Mobile : +1 (201) 960-1211 200 S Laurel Ave, Rm E2-2A03 Middletown, NJ 08873 From: onap-discuss <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Piyush Garg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: onap-discuss <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 10:45 AM To: onap-discuss <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [onap-discuss] MD-SAL Data migration Casablanca to Dublin #sdnc Hi, I was analysis the yang models for SDNC to see a impact of data migration from Casablanca to Dublin release. Below are the analysis details and some queries: - VNF-API yang: No change in the model and hence no impact in the data migration - GENERIC-RESOURCE-API yang: Lots of changes in the model but looks like only thing that can impact the migration is the removal of following enums from the "request-action" and "last-action": enum "CreateSDWANConnectivityInstance"; enum "ActivateSDWANConnectivityInstance"; enum "DeactivateSDWANConnectivityInstance"; enum "DeleteSDWANConnectivityInstance"; enum "CreateSDWANAttachmentInstance"; enum "ActivateSDWANAttachmentInstance"; enum "DeactivateSDWANAttachmentInstance"; enum "DeleteSDWANAttachmentInstance"; Can you confirm if this understanding is correct or not ? Also, can you please help me understand how it should be handled if we have any such data where above actions were used ? Like if these actions should be updated with some other action! Regards, Piyush This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18227): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/18227 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32515291/21656 Mute #sdnc: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=sdnc&subid=2740164 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
