Jess,

Thanks.  I see now that not all the jars in the various CCSDK were released 
either – so I’ll have to :

  *   Roll the version properties in my parent pom, rebuild and re-release
  *   Roll the version in the following repositories, rebuild and re-release:
     *   ccsdk/sli/core
     *   ccsdk/sli/adaptors
     *   ccsdk/sli/northbound
     *   ccsdk/sli/plugins
     *   ccsdk/features
     *   ccsdk/cds
     *   ccsdk/apps
     *   ccsdk/distribution
  *   Rebuild and re-release dockers in the following repositories:
     *   ccsdk/distribution
     *   ccsdk/apps
     *   ccsdk/cds
  *   Roll the version in the following sdnc repositories and re-release:
     *   sdnc/apps
     *   sdnc/northbound
  *   Build the sdnc dockers and release against the rebuilt versions in these 
repositories:
     *   Sdnc/apps
     *   Sdnc/oam



TSC, integration team : these activities will most likely take most of today, 
and possibly tomorrow.  So, best case, SDNC will have release versions of El 
Alto early drop available by COB tomorrow, assuming no other issues occur.  In 
the meantime, I’ll update the staging branch of OOM to use staging versions of 
our early drop – which are built on snapshot builds (so not impacted by this 
issue) so that testing can move forward.  FYI – I started release build 
activities last Wednesday in order to make the 8/2 date, and was already 
delayed due to issues with the self-release process.

I agree, by the way, that this is short term pain in exchange for significant 
improvements.  I believe a few days delay in getting the release builds done is 
a good investment in the long run.  I just wanted to make sure to set clear 
expectations on when our release artifacts will be ready and why.


Dan


Dan Timoney
Principal Technical Staff Member
AT&T
Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Office : +1 (732) 420-3226
Mobile : +1 (201) 960-1211
200 S Laurel Ave, Rm E2-2A03
Middletown, NJ 08873

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Jessica Wagantall 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, August 5, 2019 at 9:05 PM
To: onap-release <[email protected]>, onap-discuss 
<[email protected]>, onap-tsc <[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-tsc] Self releases latest fix

Dear ONAP team.

Few PTLs contacted me to report issues in self releases.

Aric, Eric, Anil and myself were investigating these. It turns out there was a 
Nexus CLI limitation
that was causing issues while releasing some repos and while attempting to 
close previous ones at the
same time.

This might have caused releases to not being posted (or partially posted) 
whenever there were
release jobs running in parallel.

We have added the fix right now and released a new version of global-jjb which 
onap is currently using.

I am scanning some releases, but if you encounter any issues please bump your 
versions and release
a new version for your artifacts. Unfortunately we cannot re-release the same 
versions that might have
failed since those autoreleases were closed after attempt a release.

Please let me know for any questions and we really appreciate your patience on 
taking us to this level.
I know is been bumpy but this will be so enjoyable after. We also need a 
perfected process so that we
can finish developing the Docker Images self releases safely.

Thanks again team!
Jess


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#18445): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/18445
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32742705/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to