Dear all, As you probably know usage of NodePorts has been considered only a temporary solution since very beginning. That's why we started working on introduction of ingress controller in order to be able to drop most of the Node Ports.
We started our work by evaluating nginx[1] and istio ingress controllers[2]. Unfortunately it turns out that istio is not starting correctly with some of the components so we decided to go with nginx for now but keep our template[3] as abstract as possible to enable easy transition to other ingress controller in a future. Our goal is to introduce ingress controller in a non intrusive way. This means that we will start by introducing ingress controller for all services next to the node ports. Then the transition period when both NodePorts and Ingress Controller are available begins. We would like to ask you to stop communicating via NodePorts and use ingress controller. After this period all NodePorts that expose HTTP or HTTPS should be removed from ONAP and only NodePorts that expose some custom protocol should be left. Feel free to reach us if you have any questions or would like to join our effort or test start playing with ingress controller in your project. Footnotes: 1 - https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-1992 2 - https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-1993 3 - https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/oom/+/90609/ Best regards, -- Krzysztof Opasiak Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18532): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/18532 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32851053/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
