Hi Folks, It seems we at Kong came to the same conclusion (Kong may be beneficial to ONAP) but I seem to have approached this problem from the wrong direction.
Being unfamiliar with ONAP at first I attended an ExtAPI meeting to pitch Kong as being a project that would be mutually beneficial to become utilized by ONAP ( https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2019-12-18+%5BExtAPI%5D+Meeting+notes ) ( https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2019-12-18+%5BExtAPI%5D+Meeting+notes ). From there we presented at an ARC meeting ( https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2020-03-31+ONAP+Architecture+Meeting ) ( https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2020-03-31+ONAP+Architecture+Meeting ) I think if you have the bandwidth watching the ARC meeting recording would be beneficial. One thing that was touched on within that meeting is our Kuma mesh which is built on top of Envoy and integrates with Kong. I think it'd be great to have a meeting to see if we could collaborate on if adopting Kong would be of benefit. Sincerely, Colin Hutchinson Kong -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20889): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/20889 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26443378/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
