I think in testsuite there is resources folder, which is meant to be somewhat 
reusable for robot files. Robot files in general are not the easiest to reuse 
(hence the shift to python) but this should work.

In my opinion I think its already pretty hard to keep track of all the repos we 
have, I think there might even be more test repos than maintainers 😊

Thanks,
Daniel Rose
com.att.ecomp / org.onap
732-420-7308

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 5:58 AM
To: [email protected]; ROSE, DANIEL V <[email protected]>; Marek 
SzwaƂkiewicz (DT) <[email protected]>
Subject: RE:[onap-discuss] #robot #test ONAP Libraries for Robot Framework

@daniel
do you suggest to reuse one of the existing Integration repositories
or shall we ask for a new testuite/robot-utils repository

/Morgan
________________________________
De : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[[email protected]] de la part de Daniel Rose [[email protected]]
Envoyé : mardi 2 juin 2020 16:43
À : Marek SzwaƂkiewicz (DT); 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Objet : Re: [onap-discuss] #robot #test ONAP Libraries for Robot Framework
Sure, we can discuss on call, I am sure there is good way to do it that’s 
better than what we have now.

Daniel Rose
com.att.ecomp / org.onap
732-420-7308

From: Marek SzwaƂkiewicz (DT) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 10:27 AM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] #robot #test ONAP Libraries for Robot Framework

Thanks Daniel! That is a good point and, to be honest, I didn't think about it 
earlier.

Maybe it's possible to include some script file that would, for convenience, 
prepare a boilerplate file structure? It would make importing Resources easier. 
I didn't test that tho.

Lets pause for now with the repo creation and I'll test couple approaches to 
the repository and import structure and present my findings on the next 
integration meeting - then we can decide with more data on hand.

My goal is to make writing new Robot Framework tests easier so I really don't 
want to hurry and add to existing complexity.

Thanks for the feedback!
Marek SzwaƂkiewicz


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21264): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/21264
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/74624084/21656
Mute #test: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=test&subid=2740164
Mute #robot: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=robot&subid=2740164
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to