Hi, Morgan, MDONS Extension in Guilin automatically depends the full function of MDONS from Frankfurt to be available. It is because of the lack of resource at the moment, integregtion/usecases/mdons is still not in place yet.
Yes. It is ok for now to make SB-00 up-to-date 100% with Guilin load for the integration test. As I mentioned in today’s PTL meeting, E2E integration of MDONS has been broken from auto topo discovery initiated at 3rd party domain controller registration at ESR to MDONS close loop. The root cause could be related to that of AAI-3219, which I am not 100% sure. Thanks, Xin Miao Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Rajewski Łukasz - Hurt <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 11:27:23 AM To: RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN <[email protected]>; David McBride <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; PLATANIA, MARCO <[email protected]>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Miao, Xin <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; David Perez Caparros <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Kuzmicki, Krzysztof (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Geissler, Andreas <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Kuzmicki, Krzysztof (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <[email protected]>; HARDY Thierry TGI/OLN <[email protected]>; Bartlomiej Grzybowski <[email protected]>; Lasse Kaihlavirta <[email protected]>; Closset, Christophe <[email protected]>; LEFEVRE, CATHERINE <[email protected]>; PLATANIA, MARCO <[email protected]>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; Daniel Rose <[email protected]>; Paweł Wieczorek <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [ONAP] [Guilin] [use cases] Documentation status Hi Morgan, “vFW CNF with CDS” use case is not deprecated as this is entirely tested under REQ-341 and all modification introduced by REQ-341 will be documented in the doc of this use case. REQ-341 also appears in the table now because I set it again status “In Review”. This table filters out REQs with status “Done” that was set before. Regards, [Logo Orange] Łukasz Rajewski, R&D Expert Orange Labs Poland, Advanced Network Solutions Agency Mob.: +48 519 310 854 Orange Polska, Obrzeżna 7, 02-691 Warsaw www.orange.pl<http://www.orange.pl/> From: RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 6:08 PM To: David McBride <[email protected]>; [email protected]; PLATANIA, MARCO <[email protected]>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Rajewski Łukasz - Hurt <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; David Perez Caparros <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Kuzmicki, Krzysztof (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Geissler, Andreas <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Kuzmicki, Krzysztof (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <[email protected]>; HARDY Thierry TGI/OLN <[email protected]>; Bartlomiej Grzybowski <[email protected]>; Lasse Kaihlavirta <[email protected]>; Closset, Christophe <[email protected]>; LEFEVRE, CATHERINE <[email protected]>; PLATANIA, MARCO <[email protected]>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; Daniel Rose <[email protected]>; Paweł Wieczorek <[email protected]> Subject: [ONAP] [Guilin] [use cases] Documentation status Hi I am currently working on the Guilin documentation. In Frankfurt, we had a wiki table referencing 33 use cases and functional requirements: https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-integration/en/latest/docs_usecases.html#docs-usecases * 12 use cases * 11 functional requirements * 10 5G functional requirements we also indicated 4 deprecated use cases (valid in El Alto but not tested in Frankfurt) For Guilin, we moved to a JIRA based tracking, according to https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Guilin+Use+case+follow-up I can see for Guilin * 4 use cases * 20 functional requirements In integration/documentation gerrit, I saw few doc updates * E2E network slicing* * PNF software upgrade * MDONS* * PPF SON* 3 of the 4 updates correspond to the filtered referenced use cases. So I think that the filters are good I would like to be 100% sure that I am not missing use cases at this stage (as we moved from 12 to 4) Use cases are waiting for the RC0 labs to run their tests (RC0 is OK, re-installation of the labs is planned as soon as possible, as soon as daily-guilin CD chain is set), so I can understand that doc has not been updated yet (even it is supposed to be due at M4 :)) @use case owners are you OK? Do I miss use cases if I consider only the Jira filtered mentioned above? If so please come back to me. See the draft Guilin doc in gate => https://logs.onap.org/production/vex-yul-ecomp-jenkins-1/rtdv3-global-verify-master/2655/docs/docs_usecases.html#docs-usecases I assume some use cases are not deprecated (e.g. vFW CNF with CDS moved here as it does not appear in the filtered jira table) @ Frankfurt use case owner, could you confirm that you will not re-try Frankfurt use case on Guilin? Of course for requirements with associated automatic tests, it is clear (hv-ves, pnf-registrate, 5gbulkpm, cmpv2, ves-collector) Thanks for your feedback /Morgan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22464): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/22464 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/78296735/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
