Thanks Kenny! I went through the proposal and started to edit, but then decided to write this comment instead. Well, did some non-native writer edits though, nits 😉
The portion of the text I got stuck with and considered to modify was these two paragraphs at the end: ======= 8< ======== 8< ========= The time has come to transition ArchNav out of the lab an into a production environment for the Architecture Subcommittee. This is a pretty straight forward technical effort for anyone with the "Must Have" skills listed below. The potential exists for ArchNav to also play a role in ONAP's documentation, education and marketing efforts, but there are alternatives, integrations and alignment that the Doc team also may want to pursue instead. So what is the right thing to do? ======= 8< ======== 8< ========= I guess the first one describes the original intent, and likely is a good idea still to improve the tool from demo to more robust “production grade”. I believe what the Doc team aspiration has been and is, is to implement the same in RTD. And I thought we sort of agreed in TSC yesterday studying and potentially starting to implement ArchNav functionality in RTD was part of this proposal. Maybe even the primary target? The reason I decided not to edit the proposal to reflect the above was that I was not sure if this indeed was the agreement, or if I just thought it was the agreement because that’s what I wanted to hear (well, after all, I’m a Doc committer). I assume once we have successfully recruited an intern, a more specific task description needs to be worked out by the three mentors listed in the proposal. Maybe at that time we can consider how exactly we want to formulate the task to study (and implement) ArchNav on RTD. With that assumption I entered my “OK” to the proposal wiki page. cheers Timo From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kenny Paul via lists.onap.org Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 2:20 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Chaker Al-Hakim' <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: [onap-discuss] Revised Intern proposal #doc #tsc Dear TSC and Doc team members; I’ve reworked the proposal based upon today’s discussion. https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/twIyAw Please read through it and feel free to make suggestions. If you think it is OK please add a comment to the page saying so. Thanks! -kenny -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#23124): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/23124 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/81956187/21656 Mute #doc:https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/mutehashtag/doc Mute #tsc:https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/mutehashtag/tsc Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
