Hi, I have a generic question/concern how the VES 7.2.1 (stndDefined) events are validated against schema reference in the VES Collector. Based on the online documentation: https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-dcaegen2/en/latest/sections/services/ves-http/stnd-defined-validation.html, I had an impression, that maintaining schemas locally along with proper public to local mappings in the schema-map.json allows for complete 'offline' (without need the VES Collector to pull any schemas from any public repository/internet). However hands-on experience and code analysis revealed that this is not always the case. In the situations, where $.event.stndDefinedFields.schemaReference has direct or indirect relative-reference to other local schema file, assuming that all referenced files are in proper locations, this whole process of validation could be offline: $ref: 'genericNrm.yaml#/components/schemas/resources-genericNrm' On the other hand, I noticed that if $.event.stndDefinedFields.schemaReference has direct or indirect uri reference, validation will always try to pull that uri, regardless whether it is defined in the schema-map.json or not: $ref: 'https://forge.3gpp.org/rep/all/5G_APIs/raw/REL-16/TS29512_Npcf_SMPolicyControl.yaml#/components/schemas/RedirectInformation' It seems, that introduced public to local schema mapping mechanism, only works for the top level schema reference from $.event.stndDefinedFields.schemaReference and it does not consider references. The actual validation is implemented in the org.openapi4j.schema.validator.v3.SchemaValidator , which is a dependency to the dcaegen2/services/sdk project. And this is how it works. However some use cases might require full offline validation and it seems that it is not possible to achieve in the VES Collector, unless all the uri schema references (recursively) are refactored to local relative-references, and of course all the files are available locally. This would be the case for many refs from forge.3gpp.org repositories.
Could you please confirm that this is a current limitation on the VES Collector? Are there any other ways to achieve full 'offline' validation other than proposed above? I'd appreciate your comments/suggestions Best regards, Marcin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#23498): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/23498 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/85106666/21656 Mute #dcaegen2:https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/mutehashtag/dcaegen2 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
