The reasoning is obvious and simple:
Condition 1: TOSCA intend to have both the topology model and process model to
facilitate the cloud and NFV orchestration.
Condition 2: Neither declarative nor internal imperative workflow is capable of
the process model of general Telecom cloud NFV process model. which I have
already elaborated in my previous mails. and you also agreed.
Condition 3: BPMN/BPEL can do this job.
reasoning result: BPMN/BPEL should be included in TOSCA for process modelling,
along with declarative workflow.
What if we not: TOSCA workflow solution is uncompleted due to the lack of NFV
process modelling capability.
I just don't understand the logic why you keep pushing back what is obviously
good for the expansion of TOSCA adaption and healthy of TOSCA ecosystem.
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
