In many other communities, as a matter of social norm, not governance, if
one is going to edit a project proposal, it is considered good manners to
ask the originator of a proposal before editing it in a substantive way.

Perhaps we should consider communicating this social norm withing the ONAP
community to avoid confusion?

Ed

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:11 PM, ROSE, DANIEL V <[email protected]> wrote:

> There has been a ton of change on the page in the last day:
> https://wiki.onap.org/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=4719246&;
> selectedPageVersions=29&selectedPageVersions=6
>
> I hope everyone who needed to be involved has been involved because I
> didn't see much public discussion about this project on this mailing lists.
>
> Daniel Rose
> ECOMP / ONAP
> com.att.ecomp
> 732-420-7308
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of SPATSCHECK, OLIVER
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 4:05 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator
>
> *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
>
>
> So am I.  I thought in the charter we had agreed that the MSO code base
> would be used for this. Similar to the 3 legacy Open-O components.
>
> Was there any discussion on this anywhere?
>
> Thx
>
> Oliver
>
> > On May 11, 2017, at 3:48 PM  EDT, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I am surprised to discover that open-o/gso is considered as the seed
> code for the Service Orchestrator.
> >
> > As far as I know, we never decided such choice during the discussions
> last week and it should be a TSC decision.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Eric
> > ____________________________________________________________
> _____________________________________________________________
> >
> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
> ou falsifie. Merci.
> >
> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> been modified, changed or falsified.
> > Thank you.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ONAP-TSC mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=
> 3WBYkehchaQg0p_gO26aU_ahomnFHCk_-us7kcQebm4&m=
> yopWEEan7upXoI1z2e3hU3o52mzgW69H-rB7ZIT8-A8&s=r3tAPP-
> TO6TFW9dliuNeUQRkuweOwDof8ZXXYNxy8nw&e=
>
> _______________________________________________
> ONAP-TSC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=
> 2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A&m=P3ocIvjpt_xeLNXVAxRECvAWNuMr4HDtz-
> qc9fROO9A&s=e4Ns63-VStxhnMGdv7vWHVfxhjlPO8z9gu3k3E6shes&e=
> _______________________________________________
> ONAP-TSC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to