Hi DeWayne,



   Do you mean that this project proposal should support option 1 and option 2( 
integrated with VF-C)?

   If it is ture, the project proposal should be changed.




Best Regards

Maopeng



原始邮件



发件人: <[email protected]>
收件人:张茂鹏10030173
抄送人: <[email protected]>
日 期 :2017年05月16日 23:11
主 题 :Re: 答复: [onap-tsc] Service Orchestrator project proposal






Maopeng,
 The rationale behind option 1 vs option 2 was based on participant input at 
the time.  As far as I know, the time has passed for new project proposals.  I 
suppose it is conceivable with enough committers that both options could be 
pursued in parallel.  The proposal is submitted however.  Perhaps the TSC can 
chime in.

DeWayne 




On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:02 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:


Hi DeWayne,


 


I am interested in and already committed to contributing to this project.


I am afraid that I am confused since there are two alternatives on the proposal 
page, but it said in release 1 the project will only demonstrate option 1( Only 
depend on App-C project)


Since we are interested in contributing option 2, I doubt it is still open for 
discussion? Or shall we document it in a separate project proposal instead?


 


Best Regards


Maopeng



原始邮件



发件人: <[email protected]>
收件人: <[email protected]>
日 期 :2017年05月15日 01:32
主 题 :[onap-tsc] Service Orchestrator project proposal






ONAP TSC,  We would like to formally propose the SO (Service Orchestrator) 
project for ONAP.. The proposal wiki page, which includes details of the 
project description, project scopes, and proposed repo names, can be found at:  
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Service+Orchestrator.   The SO team consists 
of representatives from Cloudify, AT&T, Huawei, China Mobile, Ericsson, Orange, 
Amdocs, Nokia, and ZTE.
Thanks,

DeWayne Filppi
Director Solution Architecture
Gigaspaces/Cloudify
[email protected]
714.512.1706

   















-- 

DeWayne Filppi, Director, Solutions ArchitectM: 
+17145121706http://cloudify.co@dfilppi
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to