If we want the community to vote we should figure out how to define the 'community'. Who gets to vote. In most Open Source networking communities, its the committers-at-large (meaning people who are committers on a project).
One other point of consideration that was taken up in OpenDaylight. We realized that not everyone is working from the latin alphabet, and so decided on a 'universal' ordering scheme that didn't reference latin alphabet order. In ODLs case, we chose elements. Do we want to consider this issue in our release naming? Ed On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Lingli Deng <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, there is no charter against it, and I would suggest we have the > whole community (including non-voting TSC members) to vote for the release > naming options and specific names for each release (if there are multiple > choices), as it is common practice for other open source communities, e.g. > Openstack and OPNFV. > > > > Lingli > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Alexis de Talhou?t > *Sent:* 2017年5月17日 21:28 > *To:* Arul Nambi <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] 答复: Release Naming > > > > > > On May 17, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Arul Nambi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Can non TSC members vote on these kind of decisions? > > > > > > I believe only TSC members can vote, but that doesn’t mean ONAP > contributors can’t share their thoughts. > > > > Thanks, > > Alexis > > _______________________________________________ > ONAP-TSC mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc > >
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
