Dear Lusheng

TSC members reviewed the DCAE project.  We would like to provide feedback with 
the goal of streamlining project reviews and approval in Beijing.

Our detailed feedback and questions are available on the wiki: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Initial+Project+Proposal+Feedback+From+the+TSC.
 You have already with your comments given some answers to the TSC. I would 
like to underline the following points:


  *   Clarity: Project description and scope are clear. However, the 
subprojects structure should be clarified, especially what is related to the 
platform, and what is related to service/applications (VES, collectors, 
analytics). In particular who are the committers per subproject? Some comments 
in the wiki may be confusing (for instance, cloud events are out of the DCAE 
platform, but part of DCAE applications that is part of the DCAE project as I 
understood it). It has been clarified that DCAE portal is to be used to monitor 
the DCAE. For applications, this is left to the application level. If this 
understanding is correct, it means that other projects (SDC, portal) have to 
take this.
  *   Overlap: the TSC thinks that the relevant part of Holmes should be 
considered.
  *   Risk management: the project should identify relevant part considered as 
mature (production level for R1) and identify additions/modification that could 
be delivered with the similar maturity for R1.
  *   Relevance and prioritization: this is relevant to the ONAP release.


I hope this will help with your preparations for next week's meeting.

Roberto



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to