Steve,

I think the actual code would be contributions to various other projects e.g. 
CMO needs workflows but I would think those would be additional features in SO 
not a separate orchestrator for CMO. So the CMO team members would likely also 
become contributors in other projects but we wouldn’t need a separate code base.

So I think what you are recommending is to work this as a use case for release 
2 ?

Oliver

> On Jun 10, 2017, at 8:07 AM  EDT, Stephen Terrill 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> It might depend a little on the expected final intention. Is the final 
> expectation that there will be a new module required (I thought I'd heard 
> something about that could be the case), or whether it is expected that this 
> functionality is something that would be realised solely through additional 
> to the code produced by existing/already proposed projects?
> 
> If the former we could go and setup a project, if the latter is be leaning 
> towards use cases. 
> 
> We now need to keep in mind that the projects we start now don't have to be 
> aimed for the first release, but if there is a group interested and it 
> eventually plans to have a result I don't see why it couldn't start now if we 
> are clear on what it is to do. 
> 
> BR,
> 
> Steve
> 
> BR,
> 
> Steve. 
> 
> Sent from my Phone
> 
>> On 9 Jun 2017, at 11:23, SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> During the F2F meeting we discussed a project proposal on the topic. As this 
>> addresses workflows across components rather then build a component the 
>> question came up what form this should take. 4 options are proposed
>> 
>> 1. Make it a project and add a clear deliverable (e.g. Documentation) to the 
>> project proposal.
>> 2. Make this work part of the architecture subcommittee.
>> 3. Have a coordinator on this
>> 4. Make this a use case for r2
>> 
>> In my mind I don't like #2. as it removes the clear focus of this work.
>> 
>> The suggestion was made to ask the TSC on the mailing list for opinions.
>> 
>> So please advice.
>> 
>> Oliver
>> _______________________________________________
>> ONAP-TSC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to