Hi, I also believe we should discuss Extensibility project separately, as there was not much support to move on with Common Frameworks altogether.
Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 5:40 PM To: Phil Robb <[email protected]> Cc: onap-tsc <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Special (and longer) TSC meeting this Thursday 6/22/17 Phil, I thought we decided to pursue: " • Network Function Change Management” as a use case in the use case sub committee instead of a project when we were in Beijing. Do we have to discuss this again? Please advice so I can make sure the correct experts will dial in. Thx Oliver > On Jun 21, 2017, at 3:16 AM EDT, Phil Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello ONAP TSC Members: > > We've been unable to get adequate response from TSC members in the Doodle > poll to determine when we could hold extra TSC meetings to close on the > remaining project proposals that would like to participate in Release-1. > > Given the urgency of holding these reviews so that development teams can > actually get to work coding, we are going to hold a special TSC meeting on > Thursday morning during our regular TSC meeting slot, and we are extending > the meeting to two hours this week so that we can get through all of the > proposals. > > Please look for an updated calendar event to this affect. > > The agenda, including the order for each Project Creation Review is on > the TSC Meeting Wiki here: > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC+Meeting+Resources > > As we did before, one TSC member is responsible to "sheperd" the project > proposals that fall in their domain. Please review the list on the agenda, > identify the projects that you are to be shepherding, and reach out to the > project contact to ensure they are available to present, *and* ensure that > there are no outstanding questions/issues from the rest of the TSC that have > not been addressed in the project proposals. > > Let's try very hard to get through all of the remaining proposals on > Thursday. If that doesn't work, then we will need to call another special > meeting (probably on Friday) to close on all of them. > > Thanks in advance for your help with this. We have project teams *unable* to > work until the TSC completes these reviews. > > Best, > > Phil. > > > -- > Phil Robb > Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project VP Operations - Networking & > Orchestration, The Linux Foundation > (O) 970-229-5949 > (M) 970-420-4292 > Skype: Phil.Robb > _______________________________________________ > ONAP-TSC mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_ma > ilman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=3WBYkehc > haQg0p_gO26aU_ahomnFHCk_-us7kcQebm4&m=m9Kks2xE5W3_0JTf6yJDnEuTUF2hMt9h > z0dh9cQ3pG4&s=SAKmpkar1vXIHYgRw9hb0fSzfgzgsdNjYnNmz03j7gw&e= _______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer> _______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
