Dear Chris
Thank you for your work and the presentation, we can say that this is a first 
step but we have not agreed on the architecture mentioned in your slide as 
Vimal presented another architecture (consigned by AT&T, Amdocs and Orange).
Regards
Jamil


De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
De la part de Christopher Donley (Chris)
Envoyé : jeudi 20 juillet 2017 22:05
À : [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc : [email protected]
Objet : [onap-tsc] Architecture Progress

Dear ONAP Technical Community,

I'd like to update you on progress from the Architecture Committee.

*        For Amsterdam, we agreed to use the current architecture, as discussed 
since ONS.  This is to reduce risk of late changes to the project teams, who 
have built their plans based on the current baseline.

*        Longer-term, starting with Release 2, we reached consensus on an 
approach to resolve the APP-C/VF-C challenge.  We are developing a three-layer 
orchestrator/controller functional architecture, with service 
orchestration/resource orchestration/controllers.  Note that this functional 
architecture does not imply a project structure.  Between now and the beginning 
of the R2 planning cycle, the team will drill down to the next level of detail 
on interfaces and project alignment, and then the projects will map code into 
the architecture to guide R2 plans. Cross-project discussions have already 
begun, and will continue over the coming weeks.  Meeting logistics will be sent 
to the ONAP-discuss email list for those who are interested in participating.

I have attached a set of diagrams that we reviewed in the Architecture 
Committee to illustrate both the R1 and R2 architecture.  Note that in the R2 
slide, since we are focused on the functional architecture and not the 
projects, we removed some of the boxes listing projects that support ONAP, but 
don't provide interfaces or data flows through the system.

For those interested in more detail, we will discuss this during the developer 
meeting next week.

Chris


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to