Hi Chris,

My concern is that a resource orchestrator is not an agreed entity in ETSI NFV 
architecture and its functionality is not agreed. To my understanding the ETSI 
NFV study item that should develop its functionality is currently stopped.

BR

Andrei

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [onap-tsc] Architecture Progress

Dear ONAP Technical Community,

I'd like to update you on progress from the Architecture Committee.

*         For Amsterdam, we agreed to use the current architecture, as 
discussed since ONS.  This is to reduce risk of late changes to the project 
teams, who have built their plans based on the current baseline.

*         Longer-term, starting with Release 2, we reached consensus on an 
approach to resolve the APP-C/VF-C challenge.  We are developing a three-layer 
orchestrator/controller functional architecture, with service 
orchestration/resource orchestration/controllers.  Note that this functional 
architecture does not imply a project structure.  Between now and the beginning 
of the R2 planning cycle, the team will drill down to the next level of detail 
on interfaces and project alignment, and then the projects will map code into 
the architecture to guide R2 plans. Cross-project discussions have already 
begun, and will continue over the coming weeks.  Meeting logistics will be sent 
to the ONAP-discuss email list for those who are interested in participating.

I have attached a set of diagrams that we reviewed in the Architecture 
Committee to illustrate both the R1 and R2 architecture.  Note that in the R2 
slide, since we are focused on the functional architecture and not the 
projects, we removed some of the boxes listing projects that support ONAP, but 
don't provide interfaces or data flows through the system.

For those interested in more detail, we will discuss this during the developer 
meeting next week.

Chris

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to