Hi all, Recently, the list of R2 functional requirements candidates was extended by Kang (inputs from the Integration tem) and by Zhao (inputs from vVoLTE team). https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Merged+list+of+R2+functional+requirement+candidates.
During the next week’s meeting we will continue requirements grouping and prioritization for R2. Requirements authors - please check your requirements to see if definitions should be extended/further harmonization and grouping proposals can be made. While working on prioritization, we will take into account the following inputs: 1. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Use+case+goals+and+selection+criteria 2. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Architecture+Requirements+for+R2+use+cases 3. Mostly important - goals of R2, as communicated before and will also be discussed during the meeting Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D33437.523E5A20] From: Alla Goldner Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 12:40 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org Subject: R2 preparations: functional and non-functional requirements candidates Hi all, Here is the status of functional and non-functional requirements candidates for Beijing Release: 1. Table with merged functional requirements candidates: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Merged+list+of+R2+functional+requirement+candidates 2. Non-functional requirements candidates https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R2+proposals+for+Non-functional+requirements And…Chag Sameach and Shana Tova to all our Jewish colleagues! [#ShanaTova from #Jewish Treats! #RoshHashana #Judaism] Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D33437.523E5A20] From: Alla Goldner Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 5:21 PM To: 'onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org' <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> Cc: 'Kenny Paul' <kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 'GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)' <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; Yoav Kluger <yoav.klu...@amdocs.com<mailto:yoav.klu...@amdocs.com>>; Andrei Kojukhov <andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com<mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>>; 'onap-...@lists.onap.org' <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>> Subject: RE: Usecase subcommittee meeting 18/09/2017 - the summary Hi all, Please see table with merged requirements here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Merged+list+of+R2+functional+requirement+candidates 1. I marked all pages previously used for gathering of R2 functional requirements as OBSOLETE, as we want to have a single source now and update it accordingly Note: Non-functional requirement proposals for R2 remain untouched https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R2+proposals+for+Non-functional+requirements 2. We (Alla, Yoav, Andrei) gathered all requirements into a single table with the information previously provided by the requirements authors, while adding on top of it: a. Agreed priority for R2 - this is something to be agreed by the whole group (empty for now) b. Proposed grouping/harmonization - this is our initial proposal of how those requirements may be grouped and this may be used for further requirements harmonization c. Proposed ownership - would be beneficial if each group/requirement gets under responsibility of a project (if it is a single project related) or person (i.e. proceeding with that group in the same way as was done with the specific use cases in R1) (empty for now) The AI are: 1. Requirements authors - please double check all initial information is present 2. Requirements authors - please introduce summary/link to some detail requirement description in case it is missing. This is needed 3. All - please review and provide your comments and suggestions for modifications/next step of our discussions, concentrating mostly on requirements harmonization/importance/relevancy for R2 goal of making ONAP Platform more stable 4. Luman - please extend this table with E-vCPE additional requirements as discussed yesterday Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D33437.523E5A20] From: Alla Goldner Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 10:22 PM To: 'onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org' <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> Cc: 'Kenny Paul' <kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 'GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)' <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>> Subject: Usecase subcommittee meeting 18/09/2017 - the summary Hi all, Thanks to all meeting’s attendants! Here is the summary: 1. All R2 use cases were updated with the list of their corresponding functional requirements - thanks a lot to the authors!!! Some of the requirements still need more explanation to be added though 2. Alla will merge all functional requirements into a single table by 19/09/2017, then we will work with it for: a. Removal of the same requirement appearing multiple times/extension of one requirement by functional modifications coming from another one b. Making a requirements generic i. We must target generic platform requirements (e.g. E-vCPE service onboarding, SDWAN service onboarding requirements transform to some generic onboarding functional requirement which is not supported by R1) c. Prioritization proposal of a different requirements for R2 3. Then, Luman will also add additional E-vCPE requirements discussed during the call to this table 4. Alla will check whether zoom connection is possible during next week meeting 5. Alex will check with Chris whether R2 architecture requirements will be included to guide us while prioritizing those functional requirements https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Architecture+Requirements+for+R2+use+cases 6. One of the action items to discuss during the next week joint meeting with the Architecture subcommittee is NAI/PCE coming from E-vCPE use case (in case Luman will be able to connect by zoom) 7. Non-functional requirements will be discussed jointly by the whole TSC (interested people) next week https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R2+proposals+for+Non-functional+requirements Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D33437.523E5A20] From: Alla Goldner Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 11:58 AM To: 'onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org' <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> Cc: 'GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)' <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; Yoav Kluger <yoav.klu...@amdocs.com<mailto:yoav.klu...@amdocs.com>>; Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>>; 'wangchen...@chinamobile.com' <wangchen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com>>; 'Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)' <yang....@huawei.com<mailto:yang....@huawei.com>>; 'emau...@research.att.com' <emau...@research.att.com<mailto:emau...@research.att.com>>; Long Wan <lw2...@nyu.edu<mailto:lw2...@nyu.edu>>; '王路曼' <wanglm....@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:wanglm....@chinatelecom.cn>>; Ievgen Zhukov <evgeniy.zhu...@netcracker.com<mailto:evgeniy.zhu...@netcracker.com>> Subject: Usecase subcommittee meeting 18/09/2017 - the agenda Hi all, Here is agenda for the next meeting. I am distributing it in advance, since this is the last meeting before our f2f meeting, and it is important to prepare all material towards it. 1. R1 use cases: Status and actions, required from Usecase subcommittee (vCPE, vVoLTE) (10 min) 2. R2 use cases status and progress of 3 R2 requirements categories (not supported by R1, new for R2, non-functional) (50 min) (for your reference, the status is below) a. Non-functional requirements category - was recently significantly extended and this work continues https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R2+proposals+for+Non-functional+requirements b. R1 missing Platform capabilities. This lists requires more work https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Missing+Platform+capabilities . Use cases (R-vCPE, vVoLTE) said they will be able to extend/work on this list till the next week meeting c. R2 new requirements extracted from the new use cases proposals https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=13599574 i. 5G task force has added table consisting of those requirements https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Summary+of+Functional+Platform+Requirements+arising+from+5G+Use+Case ii. SD-WAN/Enterprise vCPE and ONAP Change Management task forces are committed to do the same till the next week meeting Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D33437.523E5A20] This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
