Pamela,
  Thanks for raising this issue.  I had a quick look at some of these around 
32x/33x – yes some look like minor refactoring changes.  I agree with Gildas, I 
would move them to the backlog in your board as required – there are several of 
these and other TODO bugs that serve as markers (most should not be lost) of 
work to be done when we have time between releases in a lot of the projects I 
follow.  My opinion, but I would not refactor anything right now unless it is 
required to get E2E working and leave the review unmerged if not E2E or RC0 
gating – so you can keep your stability – as it is absolutely critical that we 
get the vFW CI sanity case fully running again.

Thank you
  /michael

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Gildas Lanilis
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 14:41
To: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-release] Problem with people creating JIRA's for 
unnecessary fixes

Hi Pam,

Thanks for bringing this up.

I would tend to believe there is a good intention in fixing those type of 
defects but it is definitely not the right timing. Like me, you have certainly 
seen some behaviors where people sometimes don’t realize they have to focus on 
what is important today to make the Release reality.

My suggestion to you. As you are the PTL, you are in the driver seat for your 
project and thus as a community we trust your judgment. More specifically, I 
would recommend to “Abandon” such commit and use the Jira field “fixversion” 
and assign this to “Beijing Release” . It may be good to tag them as 
“scan-report” (or whatever tag that makes sense to you and the team), so later 
when this is the right time you can come back on this defect.

Hope this helps.
My 2 cents.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 6:07 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [onap-release] Problem with people creating JIRA's for 
unnecessary fixes

Gildas and TSC,

Please help me. I have people that are going outside my scrum and creating 
“BUGS” for sonar major/minor fixes. None of these are critical or identified 
during integration testing. It is past code freeze and RC0 and these are 
disruptive to the process for releasing code.

I have asked them to stop over the past 2 weeks but today I have 3 new JIRA’s 
to deal with. We are trying to get our artifacts released to meet RC0 
guidelines. At this point I don’t know what to do except to bring in the 
involvement of the TSC to get this behavior stopped.

While I appreciate the help, it would have been better for this work to be done 
months ago and not post code freeze. I’m also not sure what brought on this 
sudden interest in fixing sonar major/minor issues throughout policy project. 
None of these people have spoken to myself about working on policy, much less 
added themselves as contributors to the project.

What guidance is there for this?

Thanks,

Pam Dragosh
ONAP Policy PTL
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to