Re: [onap-tsc] Next week f2f meeting

[GLOVER, GREG L]

The Documentation team has this question as well, what additional 
Documentation, if any will be required to meet “Carrier Grade”?

From: Yunxia Chen [mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 11:16 PM
To: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com>; kp...@linuxfoundation.org; 
wangchen...@chinamobile.com; TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com>; Philip Robb 
<pr...@linuxfoundation.org>; zhao.huab...@zte.com.cn; 
denglin...@chinamobile.com; DRAGOSH, PAM <pdrag...@research.att.com>; 
denghu...@hotmail.com; TALASILA, MANOOP <talas...@research.att.com>; KOYA, 
RAMPRASAD <rk5...@att.com>; Seshu m <seshu.kuma...@huawei.com>; MAYER, ANDREW J 
<am8...@att.com>; GILBERT, MAZIN E <ma...@research.att.com>; Casey Cain 
<cc...@linuxfoundation.org>; lxin...@vmware.com; FORSYTH, JAMES 
<jf2...@att.com>; stephen.terr...@ericsson.com; LANDO, MICHAEL 
<ml6...@intl.att.com>; POND, MARK <mp...@amdocs.com>; PUTHENPURA, SARAT 
<sa...@research.att.com>; JI, LUSHENG <l...@research.att.com>; GLOVER, GREG L 
<gg2...@att.com>; Kanagaraj Manickam <kanagaraj.manic...@huawei.com>; NGUEKO, 
GERVAIS-MARTIAL <gn4...@intl.att.com>; fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn; 
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com>; 
david.sauvag...@bell.ca; WRIGHT, STEVEN A <sw3...@att.com>; MAHER, RANDA 
<rx1...@att.com>; shen...@chinamobile.com; HEMLI, AMICHAI 
<ah0...@intl.att.com>; Gildas Lanilis <gildas.lani...@huawei.com>; SUNDELOF, 
ERIK <es4...@att.com>
Cc: GILBERT, MAZIN E <ma...@research.att.com>
Subject: Re: Next week f2f meeting

Hi, Alla & Chris,
Another topic I suggest that we could discuss among Arch, Usecase and 
Integration, with the input from all other projects, is related to “carrier 
grade” requirement:

  1.  What’s the priority? (I really appreciate the material Lee presented in 
Arch meeting this Tuesday regarding the requirement from AT&T operational point 
of view)
  2.  What’s the benchmark? What’s our goal for Beijing?
  3.  Top down software solution for this?
  4.  Solutions in each project?
  5.  Tools?
  6.  Etc.

And identify the responsibilities for execution, maybe let a small group of 
people to drive it.

Regards,

Helen Chen

From: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>>
Date: Monday, December 4, 2017 at 12:31 PM
To: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"wangchen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com>" 
<wangchen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com>>, Dan Timoney 
<dtimo...@att.com<mailto:dtimo...@att.com>>, Phil Robb 
<pr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, Helen Chen 
00725961 <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>, 
"zhao.huab...@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhao.huab...@zte.com.cn>" 
<zhao.huab...@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhao.huab...@zte.com.cn>>, 
"denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>" 
<denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>, 
"pdrag...@research.att.com<mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>" 
<pdrag...@research.att.com<mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>, 
"denghu...@hotmail.com<mailto:denghu...@hotmail.com>" 
<denghu...@hotmail.com<mailto:denghu...@hotmail.com>>, 
"talas...@research.att.com<mailto:talas...@research.att.com>" 
<talas...@research.att.com<mailto:talas...@research.att.com>>, Ram Koya 
<rk5...@att.com<mailto:rk5...@att.com>>, Seshu m 
<seshu.kuma...@huawei.com<mailto:seshu.kuma...@huawei.com>>, 
"am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>" 
<am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>>, "GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" 
<ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>, Casey Cain 
<cc...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:cc...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"lxin...@vmware.com<mailto:lxin...@vmware.com>" 
<lxin...@vmware.com<mailto:lxin...@vmware.com>>, Jimmy Forsyth 
<jf2...@att.com<mailto:jf2...@att.com>>, 
"stephen.terr...@ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>" 
<stephen.terr...@ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>>, 
"ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>" 
<ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>, Mark Pond 
<mp...@amdocs.com<mailto:mp...@amdocs.com>>, 
"sa...@research.att.com<mailto:sa...@research.att.com>" 
<sa...@research.att.com<mailto:sa...@research.att.com>>, LUSHENG JI 
<l...@research.att.com<mailto:l...@research.att.com>>, 
"gg2...@att.com<mailto:gg2...@att.com>" 
<gg2...@att.com<mailto:gg2...@att.com>>, Kanagaraj Manickam 
<kanagaraj.manic...@huawei.com<mailto:kanagaraj.manic...@huawei.com>>, 
"gn4...@intl.att.com<mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>" 
<gn4...@intl.att.com<mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>, 
"fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn<mailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>" 
<fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn<mailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>, onap-tsc 
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>, "denghui (L)" 
<denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>, 
"david.sauvag...@bell.ca<mailto:david.sauvag...@bell.ca>" 
<david.sauvag...@bell.ca<mailto:david.sauvag...@bell.ca>>, Steven Wright 
<sw3...@att.com<mailto:sw3...@att.com>>, 
"rx1...@att.com<mailto:rx1...@att.com>" 
<rx1...@att.com<mailto:rx1...@att.com>>, 
"shen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:shen...@chinamobile.com>" 
<shen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:shen...@chinamobile.com>>, Amichai Hemli 
<ah0...@intl.att.com<mailto:ah0...@intl.att.com>>, Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>, 
"es4...@att.com<mailto:es4...@att.com>" <es4...@att.com<mailto:es4...@att.com>>
Cc: "GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" 
<ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>
Subject: Next week f2f meeting

Dear Chris, Helen, Hui Deng, PTLs,

We will have Usecase subcommittee meeting next Wednesday, during the f2f 
meeting.

There are 2 major objectives:
1.      To discuss, along with the Integration team, our next steps in working 
on Beijing requirements, how we test and showcase those, responsibilities etc.
2.      Gather inputs from the different PTLs on what they expect us to do 
during Beijing.

We discussed it today during our regular call today with Helen, and we would 
like to invite Architecture and modelling subcommittees representatives also to 
this meeting, along with PTLs, to be able to gather all feedbacks and get 
maximal efficiency.
Inputs provided in advance are more than welcomed, of course.

What do you think?

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.jpg@01D36F31.555E9960]


This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=29RzhndOzOy7OCr_UVgPcw&m=G7esUUWNBmMe0bYGV_Wy0siYYEzxwlCWP7XRDKCMpps&s=WdBB93Zk6ktnHfuPguhEo_Yyfe4S3upPg5Ep4uH2dQg&e=>

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc