Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Cc: Rittwik Jana <rittwik.j...@gmail.com>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to