Several comments:
Scale out use case: It looks like a functional requirement instead of a use
case. A requirement could be general but use case should be specific so that
the test team could write test case and prepare some specific VNFs for
integration and testing based on the use case. I'd like to propose that a use
case should describe: in which scenario who use and how to use what function
for what purpose.
Change management: To me, it is a quite clear requirement of "live upgrading",
change management is too general to be understood. Most of teleco legacy
equipments have thier own live upgrading capability and correspondent approach
based on thier own software and hardware architecture. From my own developing
experience, live upgrading is the most complicated part in teleco software.
Different data storage policy and synchronization mechanism need different
preparation during live upgrading. I believe virtualized infrastructure might
provide some possibility to reduce the complicity of live upgrading but it is
still complex when we think about data of the software which is deeply coupled
with VNF internal approach.
OSAM: Edge Cloud is still a cloud inlude virtualized infrastracture and PNF. I
did not see any specific difference. Please clarify why this proposal intent to
introduce a new kind of resource and management mechanism.
袁越 yuanyue
资深战略规划师 Senior Strategy Planner
技术规划部/技术规划部/系统产品 Technology Planning Dept./Technology Planning Dept./System
Product
南京市雨花区软件大道50号中兴通讯3号楼1/F,Building 3, ZTE Nanjing R&D Center II, No.50, Software
Avenue,YuHua District,Nanjing,P.R.China 210012
T: +025 88013478
M: +86 13851446442
E: [email protected]
www.zte.com.cn
Original Mail
Sender: AllaGoldner <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: 2018/03/20 02:57
Subject: [onap-tsc] Usecase subcommittee meeting 0f 19/03/2018 - the summary
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
Hi all,
Thanks a lot to all meeting’s participants!
The following requirements were presented and will also be presented next week
during our session at ONS (our session is on Monday, 1 pm – 2:30 pm)
1. Manual Scaling in, Auto scaling in/out
2. OSAM
3. Change Management
Additionally,
1. 5G task force (Network Slicing, Optimization/OOF, PNF support
leftovers)
2. Parviz Yegani ((Real Time Data Event Streaming & Processing ( RESP))
3. Any more?
Please send your presentations till this Thursday, the latest.
We also discussed the need to have f2f discussions for all related task forces
during ONS, as there are many technical questions for the proposals, task force
leads will send out emails inviting for such a discussions.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
From: Alla Goldner
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 4:54 PM
To: 'Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)' <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Agenda for the next Usecase subcommittee meeting
(19/3/2018)
Hi Vladimir,
Fully agree,
I only received materials from Scott. Attached.
Others – please also try to distribute your materials in advance 9and upload to
wiki).
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 4:52 PM
To: Alla Goldner <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Agenda for the next Usecase subcommittee meeting
(19/3/2018)
Hello, Alla
Are there any materials? We will use the meetings time more efficiently if the
presentations are available in advance.
Thanks
Vladimir
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 8:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [onap-tsc] Agenda for the next Usecase subcommittee meeting
(19/3/2018)
Hi all,
The next meeting will be dedicated to review of your proposals for Casablanca,
as a candidates to be presented during ONS/ONAP meeting.
The proposals will include leftovers from Beijing (those sub-features of
scaling, Change management, HPA, PNF support which eventually will not be
supported in Beijing) plus same requirements extensions for Casablanca plus new
Casablanca proposals.
Those planning to bring proposals – please let me know so I can plan the time
accordingly.
So far, I’ve received the following:
1. Scott Blandford (Manual Scaling in, Auto scaling in/out)
2. Sumithra Bhojan (OSAM)
3. Parviz Yegani (Real Time Data Event Streaming & Processing ( RESP)
4. Ajay Mahimkar (Change Management)
Additionally, 5G task force have expressed their intention to present on
Network Slicing and on Optimization/OOF, as well as on PNF support leftovers.
Please correct me if I forgot to include some and if there will be additional
proposals.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,you may review at
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
