Let’s put it on the agenda for this week’s call and hold the vote in real time. I don’t see any value in delaying.
The issue, as I see it, is that the TSC has a difficult time achieving quorum for votes. At least since the beginning of the year, we have missed quorum a number of times, and have not been able to provide guidance in a timely fashion. In my mind, this emphasizes the urgency of transitioning to the TSC “Steady State” as described in the Charter, section 2.b.ii. We need the TSC to be actively engaged and addressing issues promptly. Chris From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Kenny Paul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 8:06 AM To: Mazin E Gilbert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> P" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-tsc-vote] ONAP Beijing Architecture Approval (ends 5PM Pacific, March 20) Would you like this on the agenda before the M4 review or afterwards? Best Regards, -kenny On Mar 21, 2018, at 6:48 AM, GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Let’s have the architecture team regroup, and initiate the vote at the TSC F2F meeting next week.
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
