Hi Kenny: Never has a negative connotation. I am simply proposing an option where all LFN platinum members have a TSC membership (supplemented with a few exta seats for non platinum significant contributors). I am supportive of putting enough guardrails for the qualifications to be a TSC member and the contribution expectations.
/R From: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 8:10 AM To: Rajesh Gadiyar <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com> Cc: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Members Composition Survey RFC - Respond by 18:00 Pacific time, May 7 Hi Rajesh, As this is a "when" question the implication of your suggested #4 is "Never". Am I understanding that correctly? Thanks! -kenny From: "Gadiyar, Rajesh" <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com> Date: Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 8:34 PM 1. When should the ONAP TSC move from “Startup” to “Steady” state operations at which point the TSC should be populated, not by Platinum Member designates, but instead by some other means, for which the TSC is responsible for defining? 1. As soon as the new method for populating the TSC is defined 2. After the Beijing Release 3. After the Casablanca Release 4. Keep the current TSC composition with Platinum members automatically get a TSC seat.
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc