Hi all,
About the 5G UC Items proposed for Casablanca captured in the following
presentation:
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/33063881/5GucCasablancaSummary-050918.pptx?version=1&modificationDate=1526064064000&api=v2
On page 6 'Performance Analysis & Optimization':
* Ericsson has proposed a solution for the Bulk PM Collection use case
which is not fully captured by the current description. This proposal has been
presented to the 5G UC workgroup as well as the DCAE project.
* Overview of proposed solution (see slides 12-20):
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/10784151/5G%20RAN%20Deployment%20-%20Casablanca%20-%20Ericsson%2004192018v2.pdf?api=v2
* Tentative DCAE planning for Casablanca which includes items supporting
the proposal:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25441571&src=contextnavpagetreemode
* There is agreement to work on UC for near-RT streaming of performance
data. But currently there is no agreed technical solution, and additional
solutions may still be proposed. Therefore it would be helpful to clarify
deadlines for the following:
* When is the latest date to propose a technical solution for near-RT
streaming (primarily to address need from 5G UC) if targeting the R3 release?
* When is the latest date to agree on technical solution(s) for near-RT
streaming if targeting the R3 release?
BR,
Oskar Malm
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: den 12 maj 2018 18:08
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <[email protected]>;
[email protected]; onap-tsc <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Thanks, Vladimir,
5G task force: the following requests were received:
1. SON support
2. Network slicing support
3. Controllers architecture
I attach them to this email.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:[email protected]]
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 6:17 PM
To: Alla Goldner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi, Alla,
Thanks for sending this. To my deep regret, there is a problem. Cisco several
times expressed opposition to having SON in this release. The reason is that
the architecture for SON was never properly analyzed.
Therefore I request removal of the following items
1. SON - problem formulation
2. SON - problem solving
3. Slice optimization problem formulation
4. Slice optimization problem solving
For all four, the concern is about splitting of the SON procedure(s) into two
independent pieces.
For #3 and #4, in addition to that, there is no consistent definition yet (in
3GPP) of slice level performance measurements. With no performance
measurements, what kind of optimization can be arranged?
Thanks
Vladimir
From: Alla Goldner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:34 AM
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi Vladimir,
The implementation proposals for 5G use cases in Casablanca was also discussed
during several Usecase subcommittee meetings and presentation is uploaded for
yesterday's TSC meting
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/editpage.action?pageId=28381537
I also attach it.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:[email protected]]
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:24 AM
To: Alla Goldner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Alla,
Can you please clarify what exactly you received from 5G group?
Unless I am missing something, there was no 5G call to finally decide which use
cases are going to the use case subcommittee. There were several proposals
presented, most of them good, but even for those I have difficulty to
understand which of them (and which versions) have been ever endorsed by the 5G
group.
Thanks
Vladimir
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On
Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 7:58 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi all,
As we didn't have any time left for use case discussion and approval during
yesterday's TSC meeting and likely will not have till the launch of Beijing due
to urgent Beijing related discussions, the meeting decision was that we will
host e2e use case approval discussions during Usecase subcommittee meetings on
Monday, 4 pm CET.
1. All use case authors - please make sure you distributed your
presentations for approval. So far, we've received 5G group, Edge Automation
and auto Scaling out
2. Kenny, as agreed, please make sure all PTLs aware the discussion will
take place during Use case subcommittee meeting
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:[email protected]]
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
