Sure, we will try DENG Hui
From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:20 PM To: denghui (L) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; onap-tsc <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Modeling Thanks you. Also please share with the TSC what requirements your subcommittee generated so the TSC can assess the different views. Mazin On Jun 20, 2018, at 12:08 PM, denghui (L) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Mazin We will try to summarize the major disagreements and bring it to TSC in next 2 weeks. Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 11:33 AM To: denghui (L) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Modeling Deng Hui, Thanks for your presentation today, and I really appreciate the modeling committee working together. Lots has been accomplished since R1. I just wanted to articulate the conversation main points. 1. Modeling approaches for ONAP releases should be approved by the TSC. This should be documented and approved no later than M2. 2. If the modeling committee is unable to interlock on a common approach for offline, documentation or runtime, then different options should be brought to the TSC for review and making a decision. Modeling directly impacts deployability. Disagreements impacting R3 should be documented and brought to the TSC over the next 2 weeks. Thanks! Mazin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3201): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3201 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/22463410/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
