Hi Kenny, Phil,

Can a candidate stand on behalf of multiple companies?

Thanks,
Ramki

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 3:09 PM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <[email protected]>; Stephen Terrill 
<[email protected]>; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) 
<[email protected]>
Cc: onap-tsc <[email protected]>; Alex Vul <[email protected]>; John 
Quilty <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Phil Robb <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] #lfn IMPORTANT- Proposed TSC Composition Language

Hi Chris,
Yes, that is correct. The method was agreed to via CIVS however a vote is 
needed to actually codify it in the language of the Community Doc.

Thanks!
-kenny


From: "Christopher Donley (Chris)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, July 9, 2018 at 12:46 PM
To: Kenny Paul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
Stephen Terrill 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "GILBERT, 
MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Alex 
Vul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, John Quilty 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Phil Robb 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] #lfn IMPORTANT- Proposed TSC Composition Language

I'm OK with the text.

So from a procedural perspective, we already agreed upon the method for TSC 
member selection, and we are simply voting on whether the proposed changes 
accurately reflect the agreement, correct?

Chris



From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of 
Kenny Paul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, July 9, 2018 at 5:28 AM
To: Stephen Terrill 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "GILBERT, 
MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Alex 
Vul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, John Quilty 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Phil Robb 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] #lfn IMPORTANT- Proposed TSC Composition Language

Correct Steve.
Approving the language in the Technical Community Document must be approved 
before we can start the actual process.


Thanks!
-kenny


From: Stephen Terrill 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 3:10 PM
To: "GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Kenny Paul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Alex Vul 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, John Quilty 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Phil Robb 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] #lfn IMPORTANT- Proposed TSC Composition Language

Hi,

I think this reflects the agreement.  I assume it needs to be closed (voted) in 
order to start the execution of the process.
Best Regards,

Stephen Terrill

On 8 Jul 2018, at 05:27, GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
You captured the main points. Thank you!
Mazin



On Jul 6, 2018, at 7:10 PM, Kenny Paul 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


TSC Members and assigned proxies for the July 12th meeting,

Please look this over and provide feedback on the language if you feel 
something needs to be changed.
I am hoping for an email a vote on this prior to the TSC meeting if there are 
no issues.
I have created a new (post-LFN) indexed ONAP Technical Community 
Document<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_ONAP-2BTechnical-2BCommunity-2BDocument&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2dwD7a5k4V9cZl09O7uTpejnZMF8aa01W3yMqrrZC5Y&m=P5QLVVsjNBGltj8JjXzZwGgPgqk9nfjUs7K20OLGm2k&s=-WQIDtUn3I4iWRjRcHjPZek8i7xP1IylcbMF5hbvXT8&e=>
which includes the proposed new sections below. These also show up in blue font 
on the wiki page.
Sub sections were added to 4.1.1 and to 4.2

Section Modified: 4.1.1 TSC Members
Was: [Reserved for future updating after ONAP transitions to “Steady State” as 
described in the technical charter.]
Now:
4.1.1.1 TSC Membership Definitions
·

  *   Active Community Members:   Anyone from the ONAP community with twenty 
(20) or more measurable contributions during the previous 12-month period, 
inclusive of code merged, code reviews performed, wiki page edits, or JIRA 
activities
  *   Operator: Any of the original 9 Platinum Service Providers participating 
in ONAP at the beginning of 2018. (Specifically: AT&T, Bell, CMCC, China 
Telecom, Orange, Reliance Jio, Turk Telecom, Verizon and Vodafone)

4.1.1.2 Size and Structure

  *   The TSC shall consist of eighteen (18) seats
  *   Nine (9) seats on the TSC are to be reserved for Operators
  *   Only one (1) person from any company, or group of related companies (as 
defined in section 4.4.4.1) may be a member at any given time.

4.1.1.2 TSC Member Requirements
·

  *   Excluding the reserved seats provision of section 4.1.1.2, TSC membership 
is not limited to LFN member companies
·       TSC members shall be Active Community Members, notwithstanding the 
exception granted in section 4.2.3.2

Section Modified: 4.2 TSC Operations
The entire 4.2.3 section is newly added
4.2.3 TSC Member Elections
4.2.3.1 Candidate and Voter Eligibility
·       Any Active Community Member (regardless of LFN membership), is eligible 
to run for a TSC seat, except as provided for in section 4.2.3.2
·       Any Active Community Member (regardless of LFN membership), is eligible 
to vote in a TSC election
·       Eligibility is effective as of the date and time the nomination process 
starts,
4.2.3.2 TSC Member Candidates
·
·       There are no limitations on the number of candidates that can run for a 
TSC seat, nor is there a limit to the number of candidates from any company, or 
group of related companies that can run in a TSC election
·       Candidates must self nominate
·       At least one person from each Operator must run for that Operator's 
reserved seat
·       A provision is granted for an Operator to appoint a person to run for 
their seat, only in the event that the Operator does not have any eligible 
Active Community Members at the time of nomination process.
4.2.3.2 TSC Member Election Mechanics
·
·       The election of a TSC Member shall consist of a single stack ranked 
vote of all candidates via CIVS ( Condorcet: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Condorcet-5Fmethod&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2dwD7a5k4V9cZl09O7uTpejnZMF8aa01W3yMqrrZC5Y&m=P5QLVVsjNBGltj8JjXzZwGgPgqk9nfjUs7K20OLGm2k&s=R_-XMDQGD1cdENkbe0G-sx-UbYAXw-gj-2_AcDbaqsQ&e=>);
·       The top ranked candidate from each Operator will be selected, for a 
total of nine members, one member from each Operator
·       The top ranked non-Operator candidates (whether affiliated with a 
company or an individual contributor), will be selected for the remaining nine 
seats, with no more than one member per company or group of related companies 
being selected.


Best Regards,
-kenny

Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, 510.766.5945
San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3356): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3356
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23178568/21656
Mute #lfn: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=lfn&subid=2743226
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to