Hi Hui and all,

 

Please see my comment inline blow highlighted in yellow.

 

Lingli

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
denghui (L)
Sent: 2018年7月19日 11:15
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: MAYER, ANDREW J <[email protected]>; Andrei Kojukhov
<[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] new proposal to change TSC report
consensus slide wording

 

Hello Modelers,

 

I have received comments from Andy and Andrei after the meeting about our
consensuses slide, as below, according to their proposal, 3 changes are
listed below:

1) Clarify On-Boarding and the Internal ONAP models are distinct
[dll] I do not think we have consensus on this. We could even save the
translator in SDC if internal model and onboarding model is the same. We
don’t have to decide now that these two are distinct.

2) remove “align with R3 IM”

[dll] DM align with IM is a basic principle for ONAP modeling practice. And
IM has a profound impact to implementation. So I would prefer we keep the
statement.

3) removing the statement “(backward compatible with onboarding model)

 

According to our recorded session

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agen
da+and+minutes

 

I re-listen to the recorded session 20180717, I did ask any objection to the
final consensus in the end.

only Michela raised the  comments to remove 3rd bullet.  I did explain the
reason, and didn’t hear any objection from Michela any more.

 

In this case, my judge would be from our session

3) is not yet a 100% consensuses assuming Michela not reponse in time,  but
1) and 2) are 2 new proposals to change the existing consensus

 

So I am asking the modeling subcommittee here whether you agree to add 1)
and remove 2)

If there is no any objection before TSC call, I will revise them as this
proposal.

 

Thanks a lot

 

DENG Hui

 

 

 

 

From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:10 AM
To: MAYER, ANDREW J <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; denghui (L)
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; Lingli Deng
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; Mark Gibson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Mehmet Toy' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Alex Vul' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Davis, Nigel' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Priya TG' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; WECHSLER, CHESLA C <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; KATZMAN, ANATOLY <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; LANDO, MICHAEL <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; HALLAHAN, RYAN <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; Lingli Deng <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: RE: Minutes from Today's Meeting

 

Andy, Denghui, Lingli

 

I tend to agree with Andy. What I captured from a meeting screen is quickly
adding sentences to a reporting slide by a chair because of lack of time.

There is obviously a room for making mistakes and inaccurate wording.

 

BR

 

Andrei

 

From: MAYER, ANDREW J <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:30 PM
To: denghui (L) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >;
Lingli Deng <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; Andrei Kojukhov
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; Mark
Gibson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Mehmet Toy'
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Alex Vul' <alex.
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Davis, Nigel'
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Ranganathan, Raghu'
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Priya TG'
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; WECHSLER, CHESLA
C <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; KATZMAN, ANATOLY
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; LANDO, MICHAEL
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; HALLAHAN, RYAN
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; Lingli Deng
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: RE: Minutes from Today's Meeting

 

Denghui,

 

We appreciate that you captured some of the major points that were agreed to
during the Modeling Sub-committee call. 

 

We do have a few questions that need clarification on the TSC readout:

*       How was the agreement captured that the VNF Descriptor model for
On-Boarding and the Internal ONAP models are distinct? We reached consensus
on this point multiple times during the Modeling Sub-committee call, but it
is not listed. Please reflect this important point.
*       During the call there did not seem to be clear consensus with the
statement “align with R3 IM”. Based on the recording we all agreed that we
need keep the Information Modeling and Data Modeling aligned during the
collaborative work on the internal data model for R4 and beyond. However,
since it was not a clear agreement, please remove “align with R3 IM”
*       Please consider removing the statement “(backward compatible with
onboarding model)”.  Based on the recording, it wasn’t clear during the
call that we had community consensus on this particular statement.

 

Best Regards,
Andy

 

Andy Mayer, Ph.D. | PMTS, D2.0 Integration | AT&T Labs | Phone: +1 (732)
420-9945 | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 

 

 

From: denghui (L) 
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:16 AM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; '[email protected]'
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: [modeling] Meeting minutes, slides and video recorded available for
modeling subcommittee call yesterday

 

Hello all

 

Please kindly help to review yesterday meeting minutes, slides, and video
recorded as below link:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agen
da+and+minutes

 

thanks a lot for your checking

Best regards

 

DENG Hui




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3445): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3445
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23743138/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to