+1 Huabing
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 8:36 AM Guangrong Fu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Randa, > > > Sorry for my late response. > > > I would like to +1 for this proposal. > > > Thanks, > > Guangrong > > HOLMES PTL > > > > > > 原始邮件 > *发件人：*RandaMaher <[email protected]> > *收件人：*[email protected] <[email protected]> > *抄送人：*onap-tsc <[email protected]>[email protected] < > [email protected]> > *日 期 ：*2018年06月26日 09:30 > *主 题 ：**[onap-discuss] [ptl][jira] Propose alignment on 1 Jira workflow* > > Greetings PTLs, > > > > One of the items in the Beijing Retrospective was confusion over the two > separate Jira workflows in play today. > > I would like to submit the following for consideration to align on ONE > Jira workflow. This is low hanging fruit and an easy enough change to > implement to progress on addressing one of the concerns raised during > Lesson’s Learned discussions. > > > > I believe the attached workflow is flexible enough to handle the > uniqueness of ONAP as well as not introduce overhead for teams. > > > > Please review attached slides and provide your +1 if you agree to the > proposal. > > > > Thanks, > > Randa > > APPC PTL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3561): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3561 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24000643/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
