One of my core responsibilities here is to ensure the health of the community 
and help it thrive.  A key component of that is to provide course correction 
and guidance where I see it is needed. As we head into our first elected TSC we 
are at a critical juncture, with anxiety in some areas that we are not ready 
for self-governance. I have seen what this community is capable of, I have 
spoken to a couple hundred of you and I have heard your thoughts, concerns, 
wishes and aspirations for this project.  I know that you are ready for 
self-governance.

 

The worst-case scenario here is that we have 18 seats to fill and end up with 1 
candidate from 18 companies to fill them. That is not an election; it is 
nothing more than an appointed TSC disguised as a vote.  They may be the right 
individuals, or they may not be, but any choice or decision making on that 
matter is out of your hands.

 

There is nothing prohibiting a company from limiting who from their company can 
run for a seat. For small companies with limited resources, this may make 
perfect sense. For large, multi-nationals with many people working on the 
project, that scenario is much less likely, but there may other reasons for 
them to do so. 

 

Unless your company has told you, "No, you cannot run." I strongly ask you to 
consider the following… 

 
Anyone that meets the criteria as an Active Community Member can run. If you 
are on this list as a "Pass" you meet the qualifications set by the TSC to run.
2018 TSC Election "Active Community Members"
 
There is no limit to the nominations accepted from a single company.  Whether 1 
self-nomination from a company or 100, all are welcome as long as the 
qualifications are met. However only the top vote getter from any particular 
company will be eligible for a seat.
 
You may be surprised.  Actions and ownership means much more in opensource than 
do words and job titles.  Just because someone else from your company has 
already submitted a self-nomination doesn't mean that the technical community 
thinks they are the best candidate to lead them. 
 

I hope that helps to answer some of the questions folks have been asking today.

Thanks!

 

Best Regards, 
-kenny

Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
[email protected], 510.766.5945
San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone

 

 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3575): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3575
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24150138/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to