Hi all,

As a reminder,

Next week’s meeting will be dedicated to the presentation by SP of their 
requirements for Dublin:


1.       Bell Canada

2.       Vodafone


Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:[email protected]]

From: Alla Goldner
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 1:17 PM
To: 'Alexis de Talhouët' <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Feed-back about features priority for Dublin

Alexis, thanks a lot!!! This really helps to advance our dialog on Dublin 
requirements and priorities!!!

We are starting a series of Usecase subcommittee meetings to discuss SP 
requirements and responses on questions raised by usecase subcommittee for 
Dublin proposals.

The first one is on October 8 – so we will have on agenda:


1.       Your (Bell Canada) requirements described below

2.       Vodafone new use cases for Dublin support

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:[email protected]]

From: Alexis de Talhouët [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 10:26 AM
To: Alla Goldner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Feed-back about features priority for Dublin

Here are a few other topics that I forget to mentioned that we would love to 
see prioritized in Dublin:
- support for the applications to be deployed in a geo-redundant fashion 
(either active active/ active passive, ...)
- support and integration of PNDA within DCAE/CLAMP
- support for database as a service. A lot of applications are using SQL or 
Postgres, maybe we could harmonized and have one cluster of each where 
application could own their dB.
- implementation of a proper CI system providing daily feedback using the full 
robot suite (e.g. run distribution and instantiation) on the state of all our 
branches, whether release branches or master. Example of such CI has been 
implemented at various place, but would be good to see that integrated within 
ONAP CI system. This will allow to catch régression way earlier in the 
development cycle.

Regards,
Alexis


On Sep 26, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Alexis de Talhouët 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello Alla,

As discussed yesterday, a critical feature we’ve been looking for is the 
ability to enable self service of ONAP by our operational teams.
With this in mind, during the Casablanca timeframe, Controller Design Studio 
has emerged . It’s goal is to create a common platform to all controller 
providing design capability to define controller blueprint, e.g. the WHAT, and 
data dictionaries, e.g. the HOW. The blueprint is using a JSON TOSCA based 
representation.
it’s leaving under CCSDK, and will be harmonize with APPC CDT. This initiative 
is well documented here 
https://wiki.onap.org/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=35523521#content/view/35523521

In order to used the self serve framework, a few new microservices has arised 
in the Casablanca timeframe. Our deliveries in Casablanca is to augment current 
vFW assignent orchestration use case to enable name generation at VNF and 
VF-MODULE level using policy based definition, and to enable auto-assignment of 
ip addresses within defined pools in an ipam system (we use netbox).

The enablement of this feature in Casablanca is permitted thanks to new SO 
building block, and SDNC generic-resource-api DGs.

There is still a lot of work to do in Dublin and sub-sequent release to 
properly integrate this within CCSDK and SDC and to be more feature complete. 
The work items are being listed here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=41422551

Finally, for those interested, we had a few deep dive sessions in all the 
components comprising this new feature, the recording can be find here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Controller+Design+Studio+Working+Session

Another feature that will be valuable for us would be to have TOSCA based 
orchestration at the SO layer.

Regards,
Alexis
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3829): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3829
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26747390/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to