Re: [onap-tsc] Request Representative from ONAP to serve on LFN Strategic Planning Committee

Wed, 22 May 2019 14:37:45 -0700

 
Stephen,
 
Yes there may be a difference.  The TAC recently approved a new LFN project lifecycle that has 4 phases:
 
- Sandbox - Project is admitted to LFN but does not have direct funding from LFN. The intent is to enable new projects to gain visibility and participate in the LFN with minimal impact on existing projects until they are ready for a subsequent state.
 
- Incubation - Project has matured beyond sandbox and may receive funding (while not impacting TAC projects) but does not yet have a representative on the TAC.
 
- TAC - Project is granted TAC representation.
 
- Archived - Project is no longer active.
 
OpenDaylight, OPNFV, FD.io, and ONAP are in state TAC.
 
PNDA, SNAS, and Tungsten Fabric are in state Incubation.
 
Please let me know if you have questions.
 

Regards,
Jason Hunt
Distinguished Engineer, IBM

Phone: +1-314-749-7422
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @DJHunt
 
 
----- Original message -----
From: "Stephen Terrill" <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc:
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [onap-tsc] Request Representative from ONAP to serve on LFN Strategic Planning Committee
Date: Wed, May 22, 2019 2:26 PM
 

Hi Phil,

 

Is there a difference between a TAC project and an project under the LFN umbrella?

 

BR,

 

Steve

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Phil Robb via Lists.Onap.Org
Sent: Friday 17 May 2019 21:28
To: onap-tsc <[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-tsc] Request Representative from ONAP to serve on LFN Strategic Planning Committee

 

Hello ONAP TSC:

 

This past Wednesday, the LFN Governing Board (GB) approved the creation of the Strategic Planning Committee (SPC) as described in Exhibit C (attached) with the additional amendment that the MAC Chair also be invited to participate in the committee.  In the SPC slide deck, it states that "the TAC Representative of each TAC project will be a member of the SPC".  That is not quite correct.  The workgroup that built the SPC proposal wanted to allow the TSC of each TAC project to choose their SPC representative however they wanted.  You can choose your TAC representative to also serve on the SPC but you do not have to.  It  can be two different people.  The SPC workload will be larger than that of the TAC rep.  In particular, the SPC representative should expect the following.

 

There is much work to do between now and the budget planning needed for 2020, and as such, additional meetings will be likely.  I suggest whomever participates in the SPC should plan on spending a minimum of 2 hours per week on SPC meetings and activities between now and the face to face GB meeting on September 26th.  The workload should go down a bit after this initial spin-up phase.

 

Please provide your SPC representative by June 3rd.  All participants should plan on the first meeting of the SPC to occur some time the week of June 17th.  The specific date/time will be selected through a doodle poll of the participants.

 

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Best,

 

Phi

--

Phil Robb

VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation

(O) 970-229-5949

(M) 970-420-4292

Skype: Phil.Robb

 

 

_._,_._,_
Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#5002) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [[email protected]]

_._,_._,_

Reply via email to