+1 Both

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:20 PM Kenny Paul <[email protected]>
wrote:

> (bcc’d to onap-tsc for visibility)
>
>
>
> Dear TSC Members,
>
> These two intern projects were approved by the TSC yesterday:
>
>    - *ETSI NFV APIs conformance test for OVP*
>    https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/DwH_AQ
>    
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.lfnetworking.org_x_DwH-5FAQ&d=DwMFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=_ueYJFS8A6nOWG9L9jpk_TDY79s6kxvoODqmb0BSiho&m=fDI8Udg7kH2gFNt4352PkACS45oUGyN0QdCz1XXT4NA&s=q3P4wyn4jQR_VidOhuZJPKAZwbszm81FF95Ep9n5byA&e=>
>    - *Modeling/etsicatalog*  https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/CQH_AQ
>    
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.lfnetworking.org_x_CQH-5FAQ&d=DwMFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=_ueYJFS8A6nOWG9L9jpk_TDY79s6kxvoODqmb0BSiho&m=fDI8Udg7kH2gFNt4352PkACS45oUGyN0QdCz1XXT4NA&s=LQ8x7nvS71K8KL5kIU18nFiRKP4sq9pvMwCa-xegD1E&e=>
>       - Approved with the provisions:  change spec from 2.5.1 to 2.7.1
>       and add “Alignment with the CNF task force where applicable”   (*I’ve
>       made the required changes to the proposal*)
>
>
>
> *The following two projects were reviewed by the TSC during the meeting,
> edited and are now up for approval - Voting ends 5pm pacific, March 17th*
>
>    - *ONAP Automation Testing - Portal/SDC*
>    https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/uwAQAg
>    
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.lfnetworking.org_x_uwAQAg&d=DwMFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=_ueYJFS8A6nOWG9L9jpk_TDY79s6kxvoODqmb0BSiho&m=fDI8Udg7kH2gFNt4352PkACS45oUGyN0QdCz1XXT4NA&s=MRYQtyPn5v79hAV3IzrV3Igsg5oihnKc8pgRI-eeVRs&e=>
>    - *ONAP Security Requirements – SDC*
>    https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/uQAQAg
>    
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.lfnetworking.org_x_uQAQAg&d=DwMFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=_ueYJFS8A6nOWG9L9jpk_TDY79s6kxvoODqmb0BSiho&m=fDI8Udg7kH2gFNt4352PkACS45oUGyN0QdCz1XXT4NA&s=lxGS_WYpmIhOlS4tP7O8Fel-PDXCj3TMeRUMv8RS26A&e=>
>
>
>
> *#VOTE Does the TSC approve the “ONAP Automation Testing - Portal/SDC” and
> the “ONAP Security Requirements – SDC” projects to be part of the 2020
> Mentorship Program?*
>
> *Please respond with:*
>
>                +1  “Both”    *or *    +1 *by project name*
>
> 0    “Both”    *or*      0 *by project name*
>
> *-1  *“Both”    *or*     -1  *by project name*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Kenny
> Paul via Lists.Onap.Org
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2020 6:02 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [onap-tsc] ONAP Intern Project Review
>
>
>
> Hi TSC Members,
>
>
>
> There have been 2 project proposals submitted by ONAP for the 2020
> Mentorship Program.
>
>
>
> In addition I have just been made aware of 2 additional intern projects
> that are desired which will be submitted tonight my time.
>
> The good news is that after conferring with the Mentorship Program
> Manager, we should still be able to get all 4 ONAP projects funded, ---
> *PROVIDED*---  that the ONAP TSC reviews and approves all of them no
> later than 5pm pacific, March 17th.
>
>
>
> Of critical importance here is that the scope for all of our intern
> projects is clear and concise.
>
>    - If projects are too broad or vaguely defined, a perspective intern
>    is unlikely to understand what the project is about, which will deter
>    students from applying.
>    - If the proposal is overly optimistic about what an intern can
>    effectively achieve in a short couple of months, it sets unrealistic
>    expectations for them during the application phase.
>
>
>
> The net results of either of those scenarios is a “fail” on the part of
> the TSC as it relates to the Mentorship Program that could adversely impact
> both our funding and participation in the program the following year.  We
> need to make sure that y’all are clear about these and in agreement on the
> expectations.
>
>
>
> I am adding a proposal review to this week’s TSC call, but knowing that we
> still have a lot of M4 work we may not got to reviewing them.
>
> PLEASE take a look at the  two proposals listed above (which have been
> posted for a couple of weeks now) and note any concerns as comments on the
> respective page, either in-line or at the bottom.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> -kenny
>
>
>
> 
>
>

-- 
Fred Oliveira
Fellow - Technology
M:+1774-505-3703 O:+1781-663-3965

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#6022): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6022
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/71934715/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to