+1 “Both”
Regards,Dong -------------------------------- ----- 原始邮件 ----- 发件人："Kenny Paul" <[email protected]> 收件人：<[email protected]> 抄送人：<[email protected]> 主题：Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Intern Project Review 日期：2020年03月14日 03点20分 (bcc’d to onap-tsc for visibility) Dear TSC Members, These two intern projects were approved by the TSC yesterday:ETSI NFV APIs conformance test for OVP https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/DwH_AQModeling/etsicatalog https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/CQH_AQApproved with the provisions: change spec from 2.5.1 to 2.7.1 and add “Alignment with the CNF task force where applicable” (I’ve made the required changes to the proposal) The following two projects were reviewed by the TSC during the meeting, edited and are now up for approval - Voting ends 5pm pacific, March 17thONAP Automation Testing - Portal/SDC https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/uwAQAg ONAP Security Requirements – SDC https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/uQAQAg #VOTE Does the TSC approve the “ONAP Automation Testing - Portal/SDC” and the “ONAP Security Requirements – SDC” projects to be part of the 2020 Mentorship Program?Please respond with: +1 “Both” or +1 by project name0 “Both” or 0 by project name-1 “Both” or -1 by project name From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kenny Paul via Lists.Onap.Org Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 6:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [onap-tsc] ONAP Intern Project Review Hi TSC Members, There have been 2 project proposals submitted by ONAP for the 2020 Mentorship Program. In addition I have just been made aware of 2 additional intern projects that are desired which will be submitted tonight my time. The good news is that after conferring with the Mentorship Program Manager, we should still be able to get all 4 ONAP projects funded, ---PROVIDED--- that the ONAP TSC reviews and approves all of them no later than 5pm pacific, March 17th. Of critical importance here is that the scope for all of our intern projects is clear and concise. If projects are too broad or vaguely defined, a perspective intern is unlikely to understand what the project is about, which will deter students from applying. If the proposal is overly optimistic about what an intern can effectively achieve in a short couple of months, it sets unrealistic expectations for them during the application phase. The net results of either of those scenarios is a “fail” on the part of the TSC as it relates to the Mentorship Program that could adversely impact both our funding and participation in the program the following year. We need to make sure that y’all are clear about these and in agreement on the expectations. I am adding a proposal review to this week’s TSC call, but knowing that we still have a lot of M4 work we may not got to reviewing them. PLEASE take a look at the two proposals listed above (which have been posted for a couple of weeks now) and note any concerns as comments on the respective page, either in-line or at the bottom. Thanks!-kenny -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6029): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6029 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/71978930/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
