TSC Members, PLEASE review the changes proposed by Yuanhong in the message below and comment if you have any concerns.
From: dengyuanhong <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 8:17 AM To: 'Kenny Paul' <[email protected]> Cc: '邓灵莉' <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Intern Project Review Hi Kenny, Thank you very much for sharing information. As the proposer of Modeling/etsicatalog intern project, I appreciate the suggestion of TSC. However, from the practical perspective, I have some further suggestions about the latest update to the intern description of Modeling/etsicatalog project: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/CQH_AQ 1. For SOL version in the etsicatalog introduction, it needs to be consistent with the G release planning with also SDC, SO and VFC, which is not decided until the finish of release planning. Hence it is suggested to remove the sentence from the internship description, and is expected to be aligned with whatever TSC approves as part of G release planning. 2. We did consider CNF support in the general description, but due to the lack of clearly defined overall design and specific requirements for catalog support, it is not listed as part of the expected outcome in the proposed version. It is important that we need adding CNF task force alignment for CNF support, but suggested to move it from Expected Outcome to the general description of the internship project (the second paragraph) for now, since currently there is no specific requirements and description, and it's hard to evaluate the workload and difficulty at present, which is essential for defining an expected outcome. We could do the evaluation and decide what to add as expected outcome and whether to adjust the workload/difficulty/duration for this project once the specific requirements are clear. To be more clear, I made the suggested modifications to the wiki page for your further review: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/CQH_AQ again? Thanks and regards, Yuanhong 发件人: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Kenny Paul 发送时间: 2020年3月14日 03:21 收件人: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 抄送: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 主题: Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Intern Project Review (bcc’d to onap-tsc for visibility) Dear TSC Members, These two intern projects were approved by the TSC yesterday: * ETSI NFV APIs conformance test for OVP https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/DwH_AQ * Modeling/etsicatalog https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/CQH_AQ * Approved with the provisions: change spec from 2.5.1 to 2.7.1 and add “Alignment with the CNF task force where applicable” (I’ve made the required changes to the proposal) The following two projects were reviewed by the TSC during the meeting, edited and are now up for approval - Voting ends 5pm pacific, March 17th * ONAP Automation Testing - Portal/SDC https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/uwAQAg * ONAP Security Requirements – SDC https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/uQAQAg #VOTE Does the TSC approve the “ONAP Automation Testing - Portal/SDC” and the “ONAP Security Requirements – SDC” projects to be part of the 2020 Mentorship Program? Please respond with: +1 “Both” or +1 by project name 0 “Both” or 0 by project name -1 “Both” or -1 by project name From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf Of Kenny Paul via Lists.Onap.Org Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 6:02 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [onap-tsc] ONAP Intern Project Review Hi TSC Members, There have been 2 project proposals submitted by ONAP for the 2020 Mentorship Program. In addition I have just been made aware of 2 additional intern projects that are desired which will be submitted tonight my time. The good news is that after conferring with the Mentorship Program Manager, we should still be able to get all 4 ONAP projects funded, ---PROVIDED--- that the ONAP TSC reviews and approves all of them no later than 5pm pacific, March 17th. Of critical importance here is that the scope for all of our intern projects is clear and concise. * If projects are too broad or vaguely defined, a perspective intern is unlikely to understand what the project is about, which will deter students from applying. * If the proposal is overly optimistic about what an intern can effectively achieve in a short couple of months, it sets unrealistic expectations for them during the application phase. The net results of either of those scenarios is a “fail” on the part of the TSC as it relates to the Mentorship Program that could adversely impact both our funding and participation in the program the following year. We need to make sure that y’all are clear about these and in agreement on the expectations. I am adding a proposal review to this week’s TSC call, but knowing that we still have a lot of M4 work we may not got to reviewing them. PLEASE take a look at the two proposals listed above (which have been posted for a couple of weeks now) and note any concerns as comments on the respective page, either in-line or at the bottom. Thanks! -kenny -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6038): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6038 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/71998158/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
