The suggestion is that we use this lifecycle to place the ONAP project portfolio into three buckets:
- Mature projects: for projects with active release participation & solid artifacts; they should submit for a "maturity review"
- Inactive (Archived) projects: for projects where there is no longer any contributions, they should follow the termination review
- Other (Incubation) projects: for those projects that are still active but not ready for move to "mature" phase
For the inactive projects, there is no guidance on who should initiate a termination review. Because there may not be a PTL, perhaps the TSC could initiate a termination review for a project. Again, we may want a working group to conduct the steps of the termination review. This group should consist of people who are familiar with the project or at least interface with/depend upon the project. This working group will need to walk through the steps of the termination review as outlined here: (scroll down)
All other projects need no action.
Background slide deck on project lifecycle reviews: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25364127&preview=/25364127/28738708/ONAP%20Proj%20Lifecycle%20and%20Review%2015Jan2020%20v1.pdf
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Distinguished Engineer, IBM
Phone: +1-314-749-7422
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @DJHunt
Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#6482) |
Reply To Group
| Reply To Sender
|
Mute This Topic
| New Topic
Your Subscription |
Contact Group Owner |
Unsubscribe
[[email protected]]
