My understanding of the Minnesota system is that there are two levels of evaluation.  One to establish the floor above which all students should rise.  Tests for this level (called the Basic Standards Test?) evaluate the minimum level of knowledge for all students departing high school (but tested at several grades prior to the 12th).  The Profile of Learning on the other hand was intended to evaluate and allow students to demonstrate what they had learned beyond the basic standards.  Demonstrating the width and breadth of your knowledge above some minimum level is a much more complex thing to do, hence, the Profiles of Learning ended up being complex, perhaps bureaucratic, and not well understood by some.
 
Properly designed tests which measure whether students are meeting a basic minimum level should never require "teaching to a test".  Teachers should already be teaching well beyond this level.  If they are not, the continuance of their jobs should be in jeopardy.
 
I would prefer that standardized testing not be necessary.  But it seems that the days when all school districts could be relied upon to graduate students adequately prepared for the life ahead of them are behind us.  In my mind, it is essential that all high school graduates have at least a minimally adequate education.  I can conceive of no way to determine progress toward that goal without some form of standardized testing. Beyond testing, some method of either compelling school districts to teach their students to least to the minimum, or making it possible for parents to send their children elsewhere for their education, if they so choose, is required.
 
I could live without a Profile of Learning type standard.  It would be appropriate to look at that again when we have been assured that the minimum standards are being met.
 

Glen Schumann
Winona, MN
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
H: 507.454.3056   W: 507.453.3567  W FAX: 507.454.1440
 
Visit my Family Home Page: <http://www.hbci.com/~gschuman/home.htm>

 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joliene Olson
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 11:25 AM
To: onlinedemocracy
Subject: [Winona] Thank you Scott

 
To go back to you question on changing the tests, I realize they are "standardized".  BUT, someone writes them.  Someone decides the questions or topics tested.   Are the contents of these tests political also?  Any thing can be changed.   That is why I say, lets look at the whole picture.  Lets determine first, what we want measured, then decide if the curriculum teaches it, and if the tests measure it. 
 
Thank you
Joliene Olson
507-454-1236
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Schumann;Glen
FN:Glen Schumann
ORG:Winona Daily News;Advertising
TITLE:Account Representative
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(507) 453-3567
TEL;HOME;VOICE:(507) 454-3056
TEL;WORK;FAX:(507) 454-1440
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;601 Franklin Street=0D=0AP.O. Box 5147;Winona;MN;55987
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:601 Franklin Street=0D=0AP.O. Box 5147=0D=0AWinona, MN 55987
ADR;HOME:;;3774 West 7th  Street;Gopodview;MN;55987-1777
LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:3774 West 7th  Street=0D=0AGopodview, MN 55987-1777
URL:http://www.luminet.net/~gschuman/home.htm
URL:http://www.winonadailynews.com
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMAIL;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20001013T115605Z
END:VCARD

Reply via email to