See below for my comments on these edited portions of your message. 
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Winona Online Democracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 22 November, 2001 09:23
Subject: [Winona] Railroads

 I am working on a project ....... that will continue the amazing transformation of the Mpls riverfront from industrial and railroad uses to one of the most desirable urban neighborhoods in the country.........
 
Railroads were once the lifeblood of the city ........  Now... they do not need to be on the river.......the industrial uses that need them -- can be farther from the water.....Reclaiming the river as a vital part of the residential fabric of the city is exciting and long overdue.
 
- Phil Carlson, Brooklyn Park
 
 
I would love to see our central city riverfront developed along the lines you are talking about. However, Winona still has active business and industrial rail shippers spread out along most of its riverfront, many of which also utilize river shipping. If and when any development space opens up, I doubt that Winona could imagine it transformed into a desirable urban neighborhood. The integration of commercial / industrial activity with upscale housing would be too difficult of a planning and engineering challenge. And anyway, our conventional wisdom is that the central city is where you put "affordable" housing.  
 
I was surprised that the editor of Big River magazine, based in Winona, was among those advocating for a riverfront main rail line relocation at last week's DM&E meeting. If that route would not replace the switching sidings there now, but be in addition to them, then his building, Jefferson's Pub, The Americinn, the HBCI building, among others, would have to go. In any case, I'll bet raising the money for this would take more than extending the half cent lake dredging sales tax.
 
 
 

Reply via email to