Hi Vlasis, Dan, Did you mean codec capability? To set codec capabilities, Try allow & disallow parameter in h323.conf file.
disallow=all ;Note order of disallow/allow is important. allow=gsm allow=ulaw Than reload the config file into asterisk. Did you mean transmission rate? The transmission rate capabilities is currently hard coded. Asterisk will be adding best transmission rate function, 5162 patch, than we able to utilize it. Your change contribution appreciated. Regards, Avin Patel Objective Systems, Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:20 PM > To: Vlasis Hatzistavrou - asterisk mailing list account > Cc: ooh323c-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [ooh323c-devel] Issues with calls to/from a Cisco router > > > In file ooq931.c in functions ooAcceptCall and ooH323MakeCall_helper > the bearer capability is hard-coded to UnristrictedData. There are > commented out lines that seem that at one point the hardcoded > defaults were Speech/64k/ulaw, so it won't take to much to test the > theory. > > I'll dig to see how much work it would take to make it a parameter > that can be passed from chan_ooh323, which would make it easy to > add it to the configuration options. > > Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vlasis Hatzistavrou - asterisk mailing list account > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:58 AM > To: Dan Austin > Cc: ooh323c-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [ooh323c-devel] Issues with calls to/from a Cisco router > > Dan Austin wrote: > > >While looking into the issues with calls to a Cisco router, I noticed a > >few odd > >entries in the router Q931 debug and the ooh323 debug log- > > > >First the router, I see up to three issues- (This is an outgoing call) > >1. Transfer capability looks like it should be set to speach > >2. The numbertype could/should be set to unkown > >3. I suspect the invalid ie is the callerid, but haven't been able to > >suppress it. > > > > > Hello, > > In relation to the first two points, it would be a good idea if the user > > of the ooh323 was able to set the capability and numbertype as well as > other similar settings in the ooh323.conf file under the relevant > gateway entry, like: > > [ciscogateway01] > type=friend > context=radius > ip=194.219.121.194 > port=1720 > ... > etc > ... > numbertype=unknown > transfer_capability=... > > etc. > > That would be very useful in terms of compatibility with gateways from > many different vendors. > > Best regards, > Vlasis. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep > through log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=ick > _______________________________________________ > ooh323c-devel mailing list > ooh323c-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ooh323c-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ ooh323c-devel mailing list ooh323c-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ooh323c-devel
