On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you see any serious problems if the code will go into svn in the > first step (which will last for a while)?
I'd like to rephrase that question: does anybody here have any credible alternate proposal? To be credible, requires not just an outline of a plan, but actual volunteers with a demonstrated ability to follow through. The ASF infrastructure team has been burned several times by requests of the form "how hard would it be to do 'X'" where X is something as simple as install a wiki or whatever, followed by a brief period of actual participation, inevitably followed by volunteers moving on to other things after their particular itch has been scratched, leaving the infrastructure team holding the bag. If a plan appears credible, typically some sort of experimental zone is set up for participants to experiment with. Joe and others can also connect people who are interested in git with like-minded others who can share experiences and workload. - Sam Ruby
