My suggestion is to leave them both be for now, but reserve the incubator/openofficeorg/ one for whatever is brought over, in whatever structure it is brought over in. Not sure what that leaves ooo/ for, but I'm sure we can think of something, especially since we are in a kind of quiet period where I don't think we should be rolling OpenOffice.org code just yet.
- Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Greg Stein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 09:57 To: [email protected] Subject: Opinions (was: Subversion - Seeding incubator/openofficeorg/ please) I wanted to raise this query to the surface for input: the name in the repository. This is easily changed, so it's really just about ongoing perception. * I used "ooo" to match the mailing list names and to keep URLs short * Christian used "openofficeorg" to match some podling references Do people have any preference? I'll rejigger the directories after a reasonably clear consensus. I can see both approaches. I may be able to immediately start some authz stuff, per Sam's note. Cheers, -g On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:39, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well... here is where we may need to slow down :-P >> >> I just created 'ooo' and you created 'openofficeorg'. I used the >> former to match our mailing list. >> >> Let's let these sit for a day or two and gather opinions on which >> naming is best. >> >> I'll coordinate with Sam before we start bothering with permissions. >> He's got a long list of people, in various states, and I doubt that >> he'd appreciate a piecemeal approach to adding these to an >> authorization list. > > I suggest that we coordinate using the incubator status file: > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html > > I've been adding people to that page as the ICLAs are received and the > Account Requests are processed. > >> Cheers, >> -g > > - Sam Ruby >
